» Articles » PMID: 7740057

Strain and Age Differences in Acoustic Startle Responses and Effects of Nicotine in Rats

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 1995 Feb 1
PMID 7740057
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two experiments examined the effects of age, genetic strain, and nicotine on acoustic startle response (ASR) amplitude and prepulse inhibition (PPI) in rats. ASR amplitude measures reactivity to external stimulation, and PPI is used as an index of sensory gating related to attention. Both ASR amplitude and PPI have been previously reported to be increased by nicotine in adult rats. Experiment 1 examined effects of chronically administered nicotine and saline on ASR and PPI in Wistar, Long-Evans, and Sprague-Dawley rats (40 days of age). Experiment 2 examined the effects of chronically administered nicotine and saline in Sprague-Dawley rats of two age groups: 40 and 70 days of age at the beginning of the study. ASR amplitude differed significantly across strains with the values for Wistar > Sprague-Dawley > Long-Evans, and there were no differences in percent of PPI among the three strains. In addition, results of Experiment 2 indicated that older rats had significantly greater ASR amplitudes and PPI than younger rats. Consistent with previous reports, nicotine increased ASR and PPI in the older rats; however, there were no significant differences in the younger rats. Therefore, age and genetic strain are important variables in the analysis of nicotine's effects on startle behaviors in rats.

Citing Articles

Strain Comparison in Rats Differentiates Strain-Specific from More General Correlates of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Tinnitus.

Koch L, Gaese B, Nowotny M J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2021; 23(1):59-73.

PMID: 34796410 PMC: 8782999. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00822-2.


Evidence of Slow Neural Processing, Developmental Differences and Sensitivity to Cannabis Effects in a Sample at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis From the NAPLS Consortium Assessed With the Human Startle Paradigm.

Cadenhead K, Duncan E, Addington J, Bearden C, Cannon T, Cornblatt B Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11:833.

PMID: 33005152 PMC: 7479820. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00833.


Acoustic prepulse inhibition in male and female prairie voles: Implications for models of neuropsychiatric illness.

Jones C, Navis T, Teutsch P, Opel R, Lim M Behav Brain Res. 2018; 360:298-302.

PMID: 30550951 PMC: 6324994. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.12.022.


Differential effects of antipsychotic and propsychotic drugs on prepulse inhibition and locomotor activity in Roman high- (RHA) and low-avoidance (RLA) rats.

Oliveras I, Sanchez-Gonzalez A, Sampedro-Viana D, Piludu M, Rio-Alamos C, Giorgi O Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017; 234(6):957-975.

PMID: 28154892 PMC: 5492384. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-017-4534-8.


Neural and behavioral mechanisms of proactive and reactive inhibition.

Meyer H, Bucci D Learn Mem. 2016; 23(10):504-14.

PMID: 27634142 PMC: 5026209. DOI: 10.1101/lm.040501.115.