» Articles » PMID: 7709456

Delayed Graft Function, Acute Rejection, and Outcome After Cadaver Renal Transplantation. The Multivariate Analysis

Overview
Journal Transplantation
Specialty General Surgery
Date 1995 Apr 15
PMID 7709456
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The impact of delayed graft function on outcome after cadaver renal transplantation has been controversial, but most authors fail to control their analyses for the presence or absence of rejection. We studied 457 adult recipients of primary cadaver allografts at a single institution during the cyclosporine era. All patients received sequential immunosuppression. The incidence of delayed graft function (defined as dialysis being required during the first week after transplant) was 23%. There was a significant association between delayed graft function and cold ischemia time > 24 hr (P = 0.0001) and between delayed graft function and the occurrence of at least one biopsy-proven rejection episode (P = 0.004). Actuarial graft survival was not significantly different when comparing delayed graft function versus no delayed graft function for patients without rejection (P = 0.02). However, it was significantly worse for patients with both delayed graft function and rejection versus those with delayed graft function but no rejection (P = 0.005), as well as for grafts preserved > 24 hr versus < or = 24 hr (P = 0.007). By multivariate analysis, delayed graft function per se was not a significant risk factor for decreased graft survival for patients without rejection (P = 0.42). In contrast, rejection significantly decreased graft survival for grafts with immediate function (relative risk = 2.3, P = 0.0002), particularly in combination with delayed graft function (relative risk = 4.2, P < 0.0001). While cold ischemia time > 24 hr was also a significant risk factor (relative risk = 1.9, P = 0.02), other variables (preservation mode, 0 HLA Ag mismatch, age at transplantation, gender, diabetic status, and panel-reactive antibody at transplantation) had no impact on graft survival. Patient survival was significantly affected by the combination of delayed graft function and rejection (relative risk = 3.1, P < 0.0001), age at transplantation > 50 years (relative risk = 2.6, P < 0.0001), and diabetes (relative risk = 1.8, P = 0.006). Further studies are necessary to elucidate the mechanisms linking delayed graft function and rejection, which, in combination, lead to poor allograft outcome.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic Hypothermia in Low-Risk Nonpumped Brain-Dead Kidney Donors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Patel M, Salcedo-Betancourt J, Saunders C, Broglio K, Malinoski D, Niemann C JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(2):e2353785.

PMID: 38416500 PMC: 10902731. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53785.


The Effect of Nerolidol Renal Dysfunction following Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in the Rat.

Hammad F, Al-Salam S, Ahmad R, Yasin J, Hammad A, Rasheed J Nutrients. 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36678327 PMC: 9866594. DOI: 10.3390/nu15020455.


Serum uric acid as a risk factor for rejection after deceased donor kidney transplantation: A mono-institutional analysis of paired kidneys.

Zhang F, Liang J, Xiong Y, Zhang F, Wu K, Wang W Front Immunol. 2022; 13:973425.

PMID: 36578496 PMC: 9791182. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.973425.


Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant: Risk Factors, Consequences and Prevention Strategies.

Ponticelli C, Reggiani F, Moroni G J Pers Med. 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36294695 PMC: 9605016. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101557.


Molecular Markers of Kidney Transplantation Outcome: Current Omics Tools and Future Developments.

Lepoittevin M, Kerforne T, Pellerin L, Hauet T, Thuillier R Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(11).

PMID: 35682996 PMC: 9181061. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23116318.