» Articles » PMID: 7703921

Dynamical Behaviour of Biological Regulatory Networks--II. Immunity Control in Bacteriophage Lambda

Overview
Journal Bull Math Biol
Publisher Springer
Specialties Biology
Public Health
Date 1995 Mar 1
PMID 7703921
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A number of bacterial and viral genes take part in the decision between lysis and lysogenization in temperate bacteriophages. In the lambda case, at least five viral genes (cI, cro, cII, N and cIII) and several bacterial genes are involved. Several attempts have been made to model this complex regulatory network. Our approach is based on a logical method described in the first paper of the series which formalizes the interactions between the elements of a regulatory network in terms of discrete variables, functions and parameters. In this paper two models are described and discussed, the first (two-variable model) focused on cI and cro interactions, the second (four-variable model) considering, in addition, genes cII and N. The treatment presented emphasizes the roles of positive and negative feedback loops and their interactions in the development of the phage. The role of the loops between cI and cro, and of cI on itself (which both have to be positive loops) was discovered earlier; this group's contribution to this aspect mainly deals with the possibility of treating these loops as parts of a more extended network. In contrast, the role of the negative loop of cro on itself had apparently remained unexplained. We realized that this loop buffers the expression of genes cro itself. cII, O and P against the inflation due to the rapid replication of the phage. More generally, negative auto-control of a gene appears an efficient way to render its expression insensitive (or less sensitive) to gene dosage, whereas a simple negative control would not provide this result.

Citing Articles

Dynamics simulations of hypoxia inducible factor-1 regulatory network in cancer using formal verification techniques.

Azhar H, Saeed M, Jabeen I Front Mol Biosci. 2024; 11:1386930.

PMID: 39606028 PMC: 11599740. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1386930.


Old drugs, new tricks: leveraging known compounds to disrupt coronavirus-induced cytokine storm.

Richman S, Lyman C, Nesterova A, Yuryev A, Morris M, Cao H NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2022; 8(1):38.

PMID: 36216820 PMC: 9549818. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-022-00250-9.


Multi-parameter exploration of dynamics of regulatory networks.

Gedeon T Biosystems. 2020; 190:104113.

PMID: 32057819 PMC: 7082111. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104113.


Control of Intracellular Molecular Networks Using Algebraic Methods.

Sordo Vieira L, Laubenbacher R, Murrugarra D Bull Math Biol. 2020; 82(1):2.

PMID: 31919596 PMC: 8177064. DOI: 10.1007/s11538-019-00679-w.


Attractor - a new turning point in drug discovery.

Hou X, Li M, Jia C, Zhang X, Wang Y Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019; 13:2957-2968.

PMID: 31686779 PMC: 6709805. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S216397.


References
1.
Womble D, Rownd R . Regulation of lambda dv plasmid DNA replication. A quantitative model for control of plasmid lambda dv replication in the bacterial cell division cycle. J Mol Biol. 1986; 191(3):367-82. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90133-6. View

2.
Lee S, Bailey J . A mathematical model for lambda dv plasmid replication: analysis of copy number mutants. Plasmid. 1984; 11(2):166-77. DOI: 10.1016/0147-619x(84)90021-0. View

3.
Shea M, Ackers G . The OR control system of bacteriophage lambda. A physical-chemical model for gene regulation. J Mol Biol. 1985; 181(2):211-30. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90086-5. View

4.
Ackers G, Johnson A, Shea M . Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982; 79(4):1129-33. PMC: 345914. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.4.1129. View

5.
Oppenheim A, NEUBAUER Z, Calef E . The antirepressor: a new element in the regulation of protein synthesis. Nature. 1970; 226(5240):31-2. DOI: 10.1038/226031a0. View