» Articles » PMID: 7693981

Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Prostate Cancer Extension to the Surgical Margin and Pelvic Node Metastasis at Radical Prostatectomy

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 1993 Dec 1
PMID 7693981
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We analyzed data from 107 consecutive patients with clinical stage B prostate cancer in an attempt to identify those at high risk for having involved margins or nodal metastasis. Each patient underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate. Patient age, surgical approach to prostatectomy, pre-biopsy prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, and number, location and maximum Gleason score of positive biopsies were statistically evaluated for all patients groups. Prostate volume and PSA density (PSAD) were calculated for all patients undergoing prostatectomy. Of the 101 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy 64 had negative margins, 37 had at least 1 positive margin and 11 of the 37 had more than 1 positive margin. Involved margins were most common at the apex (62%) and mid portion (59%) of the gland. Prostatectomy was not performed on 6 patients with nodal metastases evident on frozen section examination. Therefore, 43 patients are considered to be at high risk for having residual disease after surgery. The mean PSAD, PSA level and number of positive biopsies were significant (p < 0.05) predictors of tumor extension to the surgical margin. The mean number of positive biopsies, biopsy Gleason score and PSA level were significantly greater (p < 0.05) in patients with nodal metastases. Only 15% of the patients with a single positive biopsy had positive margins versus 47% of those with multiple positive biopsies (p < 0.05). Of the patients with tumor positive nodes on frozen section 67% had 5 or more positive biopsies, whereas only 9% of all others had that many positive biopsies (p < 0.05). The number of positive biopsy sites, PSAD and PSA level were significantly associated with tumor at the surgical margin or metastatic to the pelvic nodes.

Citing Articles

Prostate cancer nomograms and their application in Asian men: a review.

Panaiyadiyan S, Kumar R Prostate Int. 2024; 12(1):1-9.

PMID: 38523898 PMC: 10960090. DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.07.004.


Value of three-dimensional visualization of preoperative prostatic magnetic resonance imaging based on measurements of anatomical structures in predicting positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.

Fan B, Zhang L, Wang Y, Dai Z, Pan H, Xie J Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1228892.

PMID: 37859989 PMC: 10582708. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1228892.


Safe-R: a novel score, accounting for oncological safe nerve-sparing at radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Becker A, Coelius C, Adam M, Tennstedt P, Kluth L, Steuber T World J Urol. 2014; 33(1):77-83.

PMID: 24668119 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1273-x.


Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Shariat S, Kattan M, Vickers A, Karakiewicz P, Scardino P Future Oncol. 2009; 5(10):1555-84.

PMID: 20001796 PMC: 2933457. DOI: 10.2217/fon.09.121.


Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors.

Liss M, Osann K, Ornstein D BJU Int. 2008; 102(5):603-8.

PMID: 18435807 PMC: 4041686. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07672.x.