» Articles » PMID: 7668604

Effects of Electrical Current Configuration on Potential Fields in the Electrically Stimulated Cochlea: Field Models and Measurements

Overview
Date 1995 Sep 1
PMID 7668604
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Potential distributions measured within the scala tympani of the anesthetized guinea pig support the assertion that focusing is possible when currents are appropriately delivered to the electrodes in the scala tympani. Results obtained with a lumped-element model agree with measurements made in the inner ears of monkeys during monopolar and bipolar stimulation. The predictions are closer for potential distributions apical to the stimulating electrode than they are for basal distributions. In one monkey, in which electrodes were implanted in the middle ear as well as in the inner ear, we obtained measurements of the impedance from inside the scala tympani to points within the middle ear. These impedances are smaller that those initially used in the model, in which the round window membrane was assumed to have a relatively high impedance. A model of the common ground configuration was developed using finite electrode impedances. Finite impedances broaden the potential distributions in this model. Potential distributions from the lumped element model are compared with those obtained with an analytical model, to suggest ways in which focused and unfocused stimuli can affect the excitation of neurons in the implanted ear.

Citing Articles

Virtual Rhesus Labyrinth Model Predicts Responses to Electrical Stimulation Delivered by a Vestibular Prosthesis.

Hedjoudje A, Hayden R, Dai C, Ahn J, Rahman M, Risi F J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2019; 20(4):313-339.

PMID: 31165284 PMC: 6646509. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-019-00725-3.


Changing stimulation patterns can change the broadness of contralateral masking functions for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Lee D, Aronoff J Hear Res. 2018; 363:55-61.

PMID: 29548706 PMC: 5940546. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.001.


Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.

Nogueira W, Litvak L, Landsberger D, Buchner A Hear Res. 2016; 344:223-234.

PMID: 27939418 PMC: 5421637. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.017.


Improving virtual channel discrimination in a multi-channel context.

Srinivasan A, Shannon R, Landsberger D Hear Res. 2012; 286(1-2):19-29.

PMID: 22616092 PMC: 3564555. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.02.011.


Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users.

Landsberger D, Padilla M, Srinivasan A Hear Res. 2012; 284(1-2):16-24.

PMID: 22230370 PMC: 3289740. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.009.