» Articles » PMID: 7642858

ST Segment Tracking for Rapid Determination of Patency of the Infarct-related Artery in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Overview
Date 1995 Sep 1
PMID 7642858
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that monitoring the ST segment on a single electrocardiographic (ECG) lead reflecting activity in the infarct zone provides sensitive and specific recognition of reperfusion within 60 min of initiation of therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

Background: Infarct-related arteries that fail to recanalize early may benefit from immediate rescue angioplasty. Hence, detection of reperfusion has important practical clinical implications.

Methods: Of 41 patients with acute myocardial infarction who had ambulatory ECG (Holter) monitors placed, 38 had adequate ST segment monitoring for 3 h; 35 of the 38 were treated with thrombolytic agents and 3 with primary angioplasty. All patients underwent early coronary angiography and were classified into two groups: Group P (22 patients) had angiographic patency (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 2 or 3 flow), the Group O (16 patients) had persistent occlusion (TIMI grade 0 or 1 flow) of the infarct-related vessel at 60 min from initiation of therapy. The initial ST segment level was defined as the first ST segment level recorded; the peak ST segment level was defined as the highest ST segment level measured during the 1st 60 min. To assess the optimal ST segment recovery criteria for reperfusion, the presence or absence of a > or = 75%, > or = 50% and > or = 25% decrement from initial and peak ST segment levels, sampled and analyzed at 2.5-, 5-, 10-, 15-and 20-min intervals, was correlated with patency of the infarct-related artery at 60 min.

Results: ST segment recovery of > or = 50% reduction from peak ST segment levels with sampling rates at < or = 10-min intervals provided the optimal criterion for recognizing coronary artery patency at 60 min (sensitivity 96%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 77% to 99%; specificity 94%, 95% CI 69% to 99%, p < 0.0001). The subgroup of 13 patients in Group P with TIMI grade 3 reperfusion flow all met this criterion (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI 75% to 100%). The use of the initial ST segment level as the baseline for determining the presence of a > or = 50% reduction in ST segment levels within 60 min was less sensitive. Prediction of coronary reperfusion within 60 min of therapy on the basis of a > or = 75% decrement from peak ST segment levels was less sensitive, and the use of a > or = 25% decrement was less specific.

Conclusions: ST segment monitoring of a single lead reflecting the infarct zone provides a reliable method for assessing reperfusion within 60 min of acute myocardial infarction. Optimal criteria for ECG reperfusion include a > or = 50% decrease from peak ST segment levels, with ST segment measurements recorded continuously or at least every 10 min.

Citing Articles

Clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty or fibrinolysis.

Hsu L, Mak K, Lau K, Sim L, Chan C, Koh T Heart. 2002; 88(3):260-5.

PMID: 12181218 PMC: 1767339. DOI: 10.1136/heart.88.3.260.


Persistent ST-segment elevation after primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction: its relation to left ventricular recovery.

Cheong J, Shin J, Kim J, Park J Clin Cardiol. 2002; 25(8):372-7.

PMID: 12173904 PMC: 6654308. DOI: 10.1002/clc.4950250806.


The use of the electrocardiogram to identify epicardial coronary and tissue reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction.

Vaturi M, Birnbaum Y J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2000; 10(2):137-47.

PMID: 11005936 DOI: 10.1023/a:1018762509887.


The use of the electrocardiogram to identify epicardial coronary and tissue reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction.

Vaturi MD M, Birnbaum MD Y J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2000; 10(1):5-14.

PMID: 10947909 DOI: 10.1023/a:1018794918584.


Failure of thrombolysis by streptokinase: detection with a simple electrocardiographic method.

Sutton A, Campbell P, Price D, Grech E, Hall J, Davies A Heart. 2000; 84(2):149-56.

PMID: 10908249 PMC: 1760890. DOI: 10.1136/heart.84.2.149.