De Los Rios P, Rebeaud M, Goloubinoff P
Cell Stress Chaperones. 2024; 29(6):764-768.
PMID: 39549734
PMC: 11638601.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cstres.2024.11.003.
Ishida R, Okamoto T, Motojima F, Kubota H, Takahashi H, Tanabe M
Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(2).
PMID: 29415503
PMC: 5855711.
DOI: 10.3390/ijms19020489.
Weiss C, Jebara F, Nisemblat S, Azem A
Front Mol Biosci. 2016; 3:80.
PMID: 28008398
PMC: 5143341.
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2016.00080.
Iizuka R, Funatsu T
Biophys Physicobiol. 2016; 13:63-69.
PMID: 27924258
PMC: 5042173.
DOI: 10.2142/biophysico.13.0_63.
Ye X, Lorimer G
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(46):E4289-97.
PMID: 24167257
PMC: 3831975.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1317702110.
GroEL-assisted protein folding: does it occur within the chaperonin inner cavity?.
Marchenkov V, Semisotnov G
Int J Mol Sci. 2009; 10(5):2066-2083.
PMID: 19564940
PMC: 2695268.
DOI: 10.3390/ijms10052066.
Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle.
Sameshima T, Ueno T, Iizuka R, Ishii N, Terada N, Okabe K
J Biol Chem. 2008; 283(35):23765-73.
PMID: 18567585
PMC: 3259762.
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M802541200.
High-speed AFM and nano-visualization of biomolecular processes.
Ando T, Uchihashi T, Kodera N, Yamamoto D, Miyagi A, Taniguchi M
Pflugers Arch. 2007; 456(1):211-25.
PMID: 18157545
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-007-0406-0.
Asymmetry of the GroEL-GroES complex under physiological conditions as revealed by small-angle x-ray scattering.
Inobe T, Takahashi K, Maki K, Enoki S, Kamagata K, Kadooka A
Biophys J. 2007; 94(4):1392-402.
PMID: 17981896
PMC: 2212710.
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.114710.
Probing the sequence of conformationally induced polarity changes in the molecular chaperonin GroEL with fluorescence spectroscopy.
Kim S, Semyonov A, Twieg R, Horwich A, Frydman J, Moerner W
J Phys Chem B. 2005; 109(51):24517-25.
PMID: 16375456
PMC: 1414071.
DOI: 10.1021/jp0534232.
GroES in the asymmetric GroEL14-GroES7 complex exchanges via an associative mechanism.
Horowitz P, Lorimer G, Ybarra J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(6):2682-6.
PMID: 10077571
PMC: 15829.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2682.
Minimal and optimal mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding.
CHATELLIER J, Fersht A, Goloubinoff P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(26):15275-80.
PMID: 9860959
PMC: 28033.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15275.
The N-terminal region of the luteovirus readthrough domain determines virus binding to Buchnera GroEL and is essential for virus persistence in the aphid.
van den Heuvel J, Bruyere A, Hogenhout S, Ziegler-Graff V, Brault V, Verbeek M
J Virol. 1997; 71(10):7258-65.
PMID: 9311800
PMC: 192067.
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.71.10.7258-7265.1997.
The chaperonin cycle cannot substitute for prolyl isomerase activity, but GroEL alone promotes productive folding of a cyclophilin-sensitive substrate to a cyclophilin-resistant form.
von Ahsen O, Tropschug M, Pfanner N, Rassow J
EMBO J. 1997; 16(15):4568-78.
PMID: 9303301
PMC: 1170083.
DOI: 10.1093/emboj/16.15.4568.
Significance of chaperonin 10-mediated inhibition of ATP hydrolysis by chaperonin 60.
Dubaquie Y, Looser R, Rospert S
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(17):9011-6.
PMID: 9256426
PMC: 23004.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9011.
GroEL-mediated protein folding.
Fenton W, Horwich A
Protein Sci. 1997; 6(4):743-60.
PMID: 9098884
PMC: 2144759.
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560060401.
Catalysis of protein folding by symmetric chaperone complexes.
SPARRER H, Rutkat K, Buchner J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(4):1096-100.
PMID: 9037012
PMC: 19750.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1096.
Molecular chaperones and protein folding in plants.
Boston R, Viitanen P, Vierling E
Plant Mol Biol. 1996; 32(1-2):191-222.
PMID: 8980480
DOI: 10.1007/BF00039383.
Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis.
Weber F, Hartl F
EMBO J. 1996; 15(22):6111-21.
PMID: 8947033
PMC: 452432.
Chaperonins GroEL and GroES: views from atomic force microscopy.
Mou J, Sheng S, Ho R, Shao Z
Biophys J. 1996; 71(4):2213-21.
PMID: 8889197
PMC: 1233689.
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79422-5.