Comparison of Two Microwave Based Antigen-retrieval Solutions in Unmasking Epitopes in Formalin-fixed Tissue for Immunostaining
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The present study compared two microwave based antigen-retrieval solutions in their ability to unmask antigenic determinants in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues for Immunostaining. In this regard, two widely used antigen-retrieval solutions, namely 0.05 M glycine-HCl buffer, pH 3.6, containing 0.01% (w/v) (EDTA) and 0.1 M sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.0, were evaluated for (1) their effectiveness in unmasking a wide range of antigenic determinants (2) their ability to yield reproducible results (3) the lack of deleterious effects in any antibody antigen systems of interest. Both of these antigen-retrieval solutions resulted in greatly improved immunostaining following microwave-heating of dewaxed tissue sections for 2 x 5 min. Glycine-HCl buffer solution resulted in stronger immunostaining with antibodies to nuclear antigens [androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), p53, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), Ki-67 and MIB-1], cytoplasmic antigens (actin and factor-VIII) and cell-surface antigens [Cu-18, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and MT-1 (CD43)], whereas sodium citrate buffer yielded superior immunostaining with antibodies to vimentin, and some cell-surface antigens [common leukocyte antigen (CLA) (CD45) and UCHL-1 (CD45RO)]. The effect of unmasking the epitopes recognized by antibody to PCNA was equally effective with either of the antigen-retrieval solutions. Antibodies to pan-keratin, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), B lymphocyte antigen (BLA.36, CD20CY) and L26 (CD20) exhibited no enhancement in the intensity of staining with either of the antigen-retrieval solutions.
Guidelines on antibody use in physiology research.
Brooks H, de Castro Bras L, Brunt K, Sylvester M, Parvatiyar M, Sirish P Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2024; 326(3):F511-F533.
PMID: 38234298 PMC: 11208033. DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00347.2023.
Saribas A, DeVoto J, Golla A, Wollebo H, White M, Safak M J Cell Physiol. 2017; 233(5):4137-4155.
PMID: 29044559 PMC: 5805571. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.26219.
Rosas-Arellano A, Villalobos-Gonzalez J, Palma-Tirado L, Beltran F, Carabez-Trejo A, Missirlis F Histochem Cell Biol. 2016; 146(4):421-30.
PMID: 27188756 DOI: 10.1007/s00418-016-1447-2.
Chemical pretreatment of growth plate cartilage increases immunofluorescence sensitivity.
Ahrens M, Dudley A J Histochem Cytochem. 2011; 59(4):408-18.
PMID: 21411811 PMC: 3201148. DOI: 10.1369/0022155411400869.
Wang N, Gibbons C, Freeman R J Histochem Cytochem. 2011; 59(4):382-90.
PMID: 21411809 PMC: 3201146. DOI: 10.1369/0022155410396931.