Evaluating Multiple Diagnostic Tests with Partial Verification
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
To evaluate diagnostic tests, one would ideally like to verify, for example, with a biopsy, the disease state of all subjects in a study. Often, however, no all subjects are verified. Previous methods for evaluation assume that the decision to verify depends only on recorded variables. Sometimes, particularly if the disease process is not well understood, the decision to verify may also depend on unrecorded variables related to disease. We propose a method to estimate the true- and false-positive rates of multiple tests while adjusting for the effect, on the decision to verify, of unrecorded variables related to disease. To put the estimates into a more usable form, we develop a simple algorithm for creating a receiver-operating curve which maximizes the true-positive rate, given the false-positive rate. We apply the methodology to data on the early detection of prostate cancer using ultrasonography, digital rectal exam, and prostate specific antigen.
Niknejad F, Ahmadi F, Roudbari M Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024; 37:122.
PMID: 38435832 PMC: 10907048. DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.37.122.
Obtaining optimal cutoff values for tree classifiers using multiple biomarkers.
Zhu Y, Wang M Biometrics. 2020; 78(1):128-140.
PMID: 33249556 PMC: 8557826. DOI: 10.1111/biom.13409.
Umemneku Chikere C, Wilson K, Graziadio S, Vale L, Allen A PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0223832.
PMID: 31603953 PMC: 6788703. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223832.
Estimation of Area Under the ROC Curve under nonignorable verification bias.
Yu W, Kim J, Park T Stat Sin. 2019; 28(4):2149-2166.
PMID: 31367164 PMC: 6668995. DOI: 10.5705/ss.202016.0315.
Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
Collins J, Huynh M Stat Med. 2014; 33(24):4141-69.
PMID: 24910172 PMC: 4199084. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6218.