» Articles » PMID: 7486982

Molecular Site Assessment and Process Monitoring in Bioremediation and Natural Attenuation. off

Overview
Date 1995 Jul 1
PMID 7486982
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A variety of modern biotechnical approaches are available to assist in optimizing and controlling bioremediation processes. These approaches are broad-ranging, and may include genetic engineering to improve biodegradative performance, maintenance of the environment, and process monitoring and control. In addition to direct genetic engineering strategies, molecular diagnostic and monitoring technology using DNA gene probing methods and new quantitative mRNA analytical procedures allows direct analysis of degradative capacity, activity, and response under in situ conditions. Applications of these molecular approaches in process developments for trichloroethylene (TCE), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) bio-oxidation in soils, aquifer sediments, and ground-water treatment reactors have been demonstrated. Molecular genetic technologies permit not only the development of new processes for bioremediation, but also new process monitoring, control strategies, and molecular optimization paradigms that take full advantage of vast and diverse abilities of microorganisms to destroy problem chemicals.

Citing Articles

Monitoring gene expression in mixed microbial communities by using DNA microarrays.

Dennis P, Edwards E, Liss S, Fulthorpe R Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69(2):769-78.

PMID: 12570994 PMC: 143597. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.2.769-778.2003.


Effect of the carbon source on assessment of degrading bacteria with the spread-plating technique during in situ bioremediation.

Damborsky J, DAMBORSKA M, Stipek S, Jesenska A, Trantirek L, SKLENAR V Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2001; 45(1):35-40.

PMID: 11200669 DOI: 10.1007/BF02817447.


In situ, real-time catabolic gene expression: extraction and characterization of naphthalene dioxygenase mRNA transcripts from groundwater.

Wilson M, Bakermans C, Madsen E Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999; 65(1):80-7.

PMID: 9872763 PMC: 90986. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.1.80-87.1999.


Genotoxicity of bioremediated soils from the Reilly Tar site, St. Louis Park, Minnesota.

Hughes T, Claxton L, Brooks L, Warren S, Brenner R, Kremer F Environ Health Perspect. 1998; 106 Suppl 6:1427-33.

PMID: 9860901 PMC: 1533436. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106s61427.


Protein method for investigating mercuric reductase gene expression in aquatic environments.

Ogunseitan O Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998; 64(2):695-702.

PMID: 9464410 PMC: 106104. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.2.695-702.1998.

References
1.
Ensley B . Biochemical diversity of trichloroethylene metabolism. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1991; 45:283-99. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.mi.45.100191.001435. View

2.
King J, Digrazia P, Applegate B, Burlage R, Sanseverino J, Dunbar P . Rapid, sensitive bioluminescent reporter technology for naphthalene exposure and biodegradation. Science. 1990; 249(4970):778-81. DOI: 10.1126/science.249.4970.778. View

3.
Lajoie C, Layton A, Sayler G . Cometabolic oxidation of polychlorinated biphenyls in soil with a surfactant-based field application vector. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994; 60(8):2826-33. PMC: 201729. DOI: 10.1128/aem.60.8.2826-2833.1994. View

4.
Layton A, Lajoie C, Easter J, Jernigan R, Beck M, Sayler G . Molecular diagnostics for polychlorinated biphenyl degradation in contaminated soils. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994; 721:407-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb47412.x. View

5.
Selifonova O, Burlage R, Barkay T . Bioluminescent sensors for detection of bioavailable Hg(II) in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993; 59(9):3083-90. PMC: 182410. DOI: 10.1128/aem.59.9.3083-3090.1993. View