» Articles » PMID: 7427883

Assessment of Serial CEA Determinations in Urine of Patients with Bladder Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 1980 Oct 15
PMID 7427883
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in urine and serum from 294 patients with bladder cancer in varying stages have been clinically evaluated. All urine samples were obtained from patients with intact renal function and without bacterial infection in the bladder. The samples were collected before, during, and at follow-up examination after radiotherapy. They were perchloric acid extracted before being assayed in a double-antibody radioimmunoassay. The geometric mean of urine CEA levels for patients with primary tumors of Stage T1 or T2 was significantly lower than that for those with Stage T3 or T4 disease. The urine CEA levels for patients with tumors of various histologic grades did not differ. The urine CEA levels decreased from before to after radiation treatment of the primary tumor. Patients with recurrence within six months after undergoing primary treatment had higher initial mean urine CEA levels than did those without evidence of recurrence. The prognostic information for recurrence was limited to the more advanced tumors. Differences were also found between the means of samples taken before recurrence and after treatment of recurrent tumors; with regression of the tumor, a lower mean urine CEA level was found; with progression, a higher value. Urine CEA levels before any treatment were higher when the patients had a short survival time. Serum CEA levels were not related to stage or grade of the primary bladder tumor but levels were slightly elevated with metastases. The determination of urine CEA levels seems to be useful in the follow-up of patients with bladder carcinoma because when initially high, it adds to the information of the T classification and predicts early recurrence, and the monitoring of individual patients after primary treatment is useful for detecting recurrence.

Citing Articles

Trends in urine biomarker discovery for urothelial bladder cancer: DNA, RNA, or protein?.

Humayun-Zakaria N, Ward D, Arnold R, Bryan R Transl Androl Urol. 2021; 10(6):2787-2808.

PMID: 34295762 PMC: 8261432. DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1327.


A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Urinary Protein Biomarkers in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

DCosta J, Goldsmith J, Wilson J, Bryan R, Ward D Bladder Cancer. 2016; 2(3):301-317.

PMID: 27500198 PMC: 4969711. DOI: 10.3233/BLC-160054.


Matrix-insensitive protein assays push the limits of biosensors in medicine.

Gaster R, Hall D, Nielsen C, Osterfeld S, Yu H, Mach K Nat Med. 2009; 15(11):1327-32.

PMID: 19820717 PMC: 4165514. DOI: 10.1038/nm.2032.


Urine carcinoembryonic antigen levels are more useful than serum levels for early detection of Bilharzial and non-Bilharzial urinary bladder carcinoma: observations of 43 Egyptian cases.

Saied G, El-Metenawy W, Elwan M, Dessouki N World J Surg Oncol. 2007; 5:4.

PMID: 17224047 PMC: 1781943. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-4.


Tissue polypeptide antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen lack diagnostic accuracy in urothelial carcinoma.

Stefanovic V, Mitic-Zlatkovic M, Ignjatovic I, Vlajkovic M, Scepovic Z Int Urol Nephrol. 2000; 31(4):443-9.

PMID: 10668938 DOI: 10.1023/a:1007103009313.