» Articles » PMID: 7418755

Relationship Between the Dynamic Range of Cochlear Nerve Fibres and Their Spontaneous Activity

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1980 Jan 1
PMID 7418755
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The dynamic ranges of cochlear nerve fibres in cats were determined automatically and were related to the fibres' rates of spontaneous activity, in both pooled data and data from individual cochlear nerves. The dynamic range represents the range of levels of a tone at the characteristic frequency of the fibre evoking mean discharge rates between spontaneous and saturated activity. In common with the findings of other investigators, the distribution of spontaneous discharge rates was bimodal. The total population could be divided into two sub-populations with spontaneous discharge rates above and below 15 spikes/s, respectively. The mean dynamic range of fibres having spontaneous discharge rates in excess of 15 spikes/s, was 41 dB (+/- 0.65 S.E.); that for fibres with rates below 15 spikes/s was 50 dB (+/- 1.2 S.E.). While the distributions of dynamic ranges of the two populations overlapped, they were significantly different, and dynamic ranges in excess of 60 dB were only found in substantial numbers (23%) in the population having low spontaneous discharge rates. Some of these were not saturated at the highest stimulus levels used.

Citing Articles

Effects of Age on Responses of Principal Cells of the Mouse Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus in Quiet and Noise.

Postolache M, Connelly Graham C, Burke K, Lauer A, Xu-Friedman M eNeuro. 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39134409 PMC: 11320020. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0215-24.2024.


Echolocating bats show species-specific variation in susceptibility to acoustic forward masking.

Capshaw G, Diebold C, Sterbing S, Lauer A, Moss C J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 156(1):511-523.

PMID: 39013168 PMC: 11254387. DOI: 10.1121/10.0026624.


An Anatomical and Physiological Basis for Flexible Coincidence Detection in the Auditory System.

Kreeger L, Honnuraiah S, Maeker S, Shea S, Fishell G, Goodrich L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38464181 PMC: 10925315. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.29.582808.


Adaptation in auditory processing.

Willmore B, King A Physiol Rev. 2022; 103(2):1025-1058.

PMID: 36049112 PMC: 9829473. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2022.


The Relative and Combined Effects of Noise Exposure and Aging on Auditory Peripheral Neural Deafferentation: A Narrative Review.

Shehabi A, Prendergast G, Plack C Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:877588.

PMID: 35813954 PMC: 9260498. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.877588.


References
1.
Nomoto M, Suga N, Katsuki Y . DISCHARGE PATTERN AND INHIBITION OF PRIMARY AUDITORY NERVE FIBERS IN THE MONKEY. J Neurophysiol. 1964; 27:768-87. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.5.768. View

2.
Palmer A, Evans E . Cochlear fibre rate--intensity functions: no evidence for basilar membrane nonlinearities. Hear Res. 1980; 2(3-4):319-26. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(80)90065-9. View

3.
Sachs M, Young E . Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate. J Acoust Soc Am. 1979; 66(2):470-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.383098. View

4.
Kiang N, Moxon E, Levine R . Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. Ciba Found Symp. 1970; :241-73. DOI: 10.1002/9780470719756.ch15. View

5.
Liberman M . Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978; 63(2):442-55. DOI: 10.1121/1.381736. View