» Articles » PMID: 7320874

Water Reabsorption Capacity of the Proximal Convoluted Tubule: a Microperfusion Study on Rat Kidney

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1981 Jul 1
PMID 7320874
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. The differences in the water reabsorption capacity observed from one proximal tubule to another were investigated in vivo by continuous microperfusion. 2. Two to seven loops were punctured along the same tubule. The [3H]inulin, 22Na, [14C]glucose, sodium, chloride and magnesium concentrations as well as the osmolality of the collected samples were studied as a function of the perfused length. 3. With Ringer bicarbonate solution perfused in Saclay Wistar rats, the water reabsorption capacity ranged from 0 to 3 nl . min-1 . mm-1 depending on the tubule. This reabsorption rate was closely correlated with the unidirectional reabsorption flux of sodium, and with the rise in tubular chloride and magnesium concentrations. 4. In Munich Wistar rats with glomeruli accessible at the kidney surface, tubule perfusion with a Ringer bicarbonate solution showed that the highest water reabsorption rates per mm of tubule were found for the perfusion sites closest to the glomerulus; water fluxes were also positively correlated with glucose transport. 5. In a second series of experiments on Saclay rats, perfusion of a Ringer solution containing a high chloride concentration (137 m-equiv/l.) was unable to increase the water reabsorption rate compared to the control perfusion; here again, water fluxes were positively correlated with glucose transport.

Citing Articles

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein inhibits megalin-mediated albumin endocytosis in proximal tubule epithelial cells.

Silva-Aguiar R, Teixeira D, Peruchetti D, Florentino L, Peres R, Gomes C Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2022; 1868(12):166496.

PMID: 35863591 PMC: 9290338. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2022.166496.


Sensing of tubular flow and renal electrolyte transport.

Verschuren E, Castenmiller C, Peters D, Arjona F, Bindels R, Hoenderop J Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020; 16(6):337-351.

PMID: 32127698 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-020-0259-8.


Discerning the role of mechanosensors in regulating proximal tubule function.

Raghavan V, Weisz O Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2015; 310(1):F1-5.

PMID: 26662200 PMC: 4675802. DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00373.2015.


Dependence of water movement on sodium transport in kidney proximal tubule: a microperfusion study substituting lithium for sodium.

Corman B, Roinel N, de Rouffignac C J Membr Biol. 1981; 62(1-2):105-11.

PMID: 7277472 DOI: 10.1007/BF01870204.

References
1.
HAYSLETT J, Kashgarian M, EPSTEIN F . Changes in proximal and distal tubular reabsorption produced by rapid expansion of extracellular fluid. J Clin Invest. 1967; 46(7):1254-63. PMC: 297124. DOI: 10.1172/JCI105618. View

2.
Sonnenberg H, Deetjen P . [METHODS FOR PERFUSING SINGLE NEPHRON SEGMENTS]. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1964; 278:669-74. View

3.
Loeschke K, Baumann K . [Kinetic study of D-glucose reabsorption in the proximal convoluted tubule of rat kidney]. Pflugers Arch. 1969; 305(2):139-54. DOI: 10.1007/BF00585841. View

4.
Morel F, Roinel N, Le Grimellec C . Electron probe analysis of tubular fluid composition. Nephron. 1969; 6(3):350-64. DOI: 10.1159/000179738. View

5.
Morgan T, BERLINER R . In vivo perfusion of proximal tubules of the rat: glomerulotubular balance. Am J Physiol. 1969; 217(4):992-7. DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1969.217.4.992. View