Intracardiac Electrophysiologic Techniques in Recurrent Syncope of Unknown Case
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Twenty-five patients with recurrent episodes of syncope, unexplained despite thorough medical and neurologic evaluation, underwent intracardiac electrophysiologic study with programmed stimulation. Electrophysiologic study yielded a presumptive diagnosis in 17 patients: nine with rapid ventricular tachycardia by programmed stimulation, three with intra-His conduction delays, one with symptomatic atrial flutter, one with sick sinus syndrome, and three with persistent hypervagotonia manifested as atropine-reversible prolongation of atrioventricular nodal refractoriness. Therapy based on these findings provided complete symptomatic relief in 14 and improvement in one of these 17 patients during a mean follow-up of 18 +/- 10 months. Therapy based on electrophysiologic testing was ineffective in two of the 17 patients. Syncope persisted in four of the eight patients in whom electrophysiologic study did not define a probable arrhythmic mechanism. These observations indicate that full electrophysiologic evaluation with programmed stimulation is useful in the diagnosis and therapy of recurrent unexplained syncope.
Evaluation of syncope: an overview.
Gupta A, Maheshwari A, Lokhandwala Y Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2006; 1(1):12-22.
PMID: 17006567 PMC: 1569893.
Kanjwal M, Grubb B Curr Cardiol Rep. 2005; 7(5):329-35.
PMID: 16105487 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-005-0085-4.
Changing concepts of electrophysiology testing for ventricular arrhythmias.
Akhtar M J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999; 4 Suppl 1:17-9.
PMID: 10590484 DOI: 10.1023/a:1009801809035.
Underwood R, Sra J, Akhtar M Clin Cardiol. 1997; 20(9):753-8.
PMID: 9294665 PMC: 6655294. DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960200908.
Arrhythmic syncope: what to do when ambulatory monitoring is non-diagnostic.
Lewis R, Boudoulas H, Voto S, Schaal S, Stang J Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1984; 96:131-40.
PMID: 6537675 PMC: 2279629.