» Articles » PMID: 724184

Use of Professional Patients in Teaching Pelvic Examinations

Overview
Journal Obstet Gynecol
Date 1978 Nov 1
PMID 724184
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Learning proper techniques in physical examinations is mandatory for a physician. Although students may examine each other in early training, examination of the female pelvis does not readily conform to this reciprocity. A randomized study was conducted, comparing teaching methods utilizing professional patients or plastic models. Training on a professional patient significantly increased a student's chance of palpating one or both ovaries, reduced the student's anxiety about performing a pelvic examination, and may have improved the student's gentleness. Costs of the professional patient method were minimal. It is recommended that teaching pelvic examinations with the professional patient replace teaching on the plastic model.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the value of a 3D printed model for hands-on training of gynecological pelvic examination.

Kiesel M, Beyers I, Kalisz A, Wockel A, Quenzer A, Schlaiss T 3D Print Med. 2022; 8(1):20.

PMID: 35793005 PMC: 9261074. DOI: 10.1186/s41205-022-00149-5.


A 3D printed model of the female pelvis for practical education of gynecological pelvic examination.

Kiesel M, Beyers I, Kalisz A, Joukhadar R, Wockel A, Herbert S 3D Print Med. 2022; 8(1):13.

PMID: 35511353 PMC: 9069962. DOI: 10.1186/s41205-022-00139-7.


The association of standardized patient educators (ASPE) gynecological teaching associate (GTA) and male urogenital teaching associate (MUTA) standards of best practice.

Hopkins H, Weaks C, Webster T, Elcin M Adv Simul (Lond). 2021; 6(1):23.

PMID: 34154661 PMC: 8215835. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-021-00162-4.