The Relationship Between Sighting Dominance and the Fading of a Stabilized Retinal Image

Overview

Journal Percept Psychophys

Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology

Date 1982 Dec 1

PMID 7167356

Authors

C Porac

S Coren

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

References

Hochheimer B . Polarized light retinal photography of a monkey eye. Vision Res. 1978; 18(1):19-23. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90071-8. View

Lester G . Haidinger's brushes and the perception of polarization: the history to the present of an on-going problem. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1970; 34(1):106-14. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90009-0. View

STANWORTH , Naylor E . Haidinger's brushes and the retinal receptors; with a note on the Stiles-Crawford effect. Br J Ophthalmol. 1950; 34(5):282-91. PMC: 1323517. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.34.5.282. View

Mefferd Jr R, WIELAND B, Dufilho L . Systematic alterations of the apparent centers of lines. Percept Mot Skills. 1969; 28(3):803-25. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1969.28.3.803. View

Coren S, Porac C . Monocular asymmetries in visual latency as a function of sighting dominance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982; 59(12):987-90. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198212000-00009. View

Porac C, Coren S . The dominant eye. Psychol Bull. 1976; 83(5):880-97. View

SLOAN L, NAQUIN H . A quantitative test for determining the visibility of the Haidinger brushes: clinical applications. Am J Ophthalmol. 1955; 40(3):393-406. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(55)91874-2. View

MONEY J . Studies on the function of sighting dominance. Q J Exp Psychol. 1972; 24(4):454-64. DOI: 10.1080/14640747208400305. View

Porac C, Coren S . Monocular asymmetries in recognition after an eye movement: sighting dominance and dextrality. Percept Psychophys. 1979; 25(1):55-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206110. View

10.

Coren S, Porac C . Size accentuation in the dominant eye. Nature. 1976; 260(5551):527-8. DOI: 10.1038/260527a0. View

11.

MINUCCI P, CONNORS M . REACTION TIME UNDER THREE VIEWING CONDITIONS: BINOCULAR, DOMINANT EYE, AND NONDOMINANT EYE. J Exp Psychol. 1964; 67:268-75. DOI: 10.1037/h0039953. View

12.

Coren S, Duckman R . Ocular dominance and amblyopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975; 52(1):47-50. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-197501000-00006. View

13.

Wade N . On interocular transfer of the movement aftereffect in indivuals with and without normal binocular vision. Perception. 1976; 5(1):113-8. DOI: 10.1068/p050113. View

14.

Ono H, Barbeito R . The cyclopean eye vs. the sighting-dominant eye as the center of visual direction. Percept Psychophys. 1982; 32(3):201-10. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206224. View

15.

Brown D, Schmidt M, Fulgham D, Cosgrove M . Human receptive field characteristics: probe analysis of stabilized images. Vision Res. 1973; 13(2):231-44. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90102-8. View

16.

Coren S, Kaplan C . Patterns of ocular dominance. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1973; 50(4):283-92. View

17.

Porac C, Coren S . Suppressive processes in binocular vision: ocular dominance and amblyopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975; 52(10):651-7. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-197510000-00001. View

18.

Mefferd Jr R, WIELAND B . Influence of eye dominance on the apparent centers of simple horizontal lines. Percept Mot Skills. 1969; 28(3):847-50. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1969.28.3.847. View

19.

Porac C, Coren S . Sighting dominance and binocular rivalry. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978; 55(3):208-13. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-197803000-00011. View

20.

Sharpe C . The visibility and fading of thin lines visualized by their controlled movement across the retina. J Physiol. 1972; 222(1):113-34. PMC: 1331419. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009790. View