» Articles » PMID: 7160050

High-dose Methotrexate: a Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation. Treatment of Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Using a Prospective Mathematical Model and Pharmacokinetic Surveillance

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 1982 Jan 1
PMID 7160050
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Some of 66 patients with head and neck tumors were treated with high-dose methotrexate monochemotherapy. The use of a prospective mathematical model with pharmacokinetic surveillance proved to be reliable, practical, and useful. By this means chemotherapy could be individualized, with a resultant marked reduction in the frequency and severity of toxicity. The onset of clinical toxic manifestations was significantly correlated with a poor therapeutic response and poor prognosis. The patients were classified in to three groups according to poor, intermediate, and good pharmacokinetic parameters calculated after an intravenous identification dose of methotrexate. These group allocations had a very high prognostic value with regard to toxicity, and especially to the quality of therapeutic response to high-dose methotrexate. They are suggested as useful guidelines in the prescription of high-dose methotrexate chemotherapy.

Citing Articles

Determinants of the elimination of methotrexate and 7-hydroxy-methotrexate following high-dose infusional therapy to cancer patients.

Joerger M, Huitema A, van den Bongard H, Baas P, Schornagel J, Schellens J Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006; 62(1):71-80.

PMID: 16842380 PMC: 1885068. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02513.x.


Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

van den Bongard H, Mathot R, Beijnen J, Schellens J Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000; 39(5):345-67.

PMID: 11108434 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200039050-00004.


Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Canal P, Chatelut E, Guichard S Drugs. 1999; 56(6):1019-38.

PMID: 9878990 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199856060-00006.


Benefits of pharmacological knowledge in the design and monitoring of cancer chemotherapy.

Canal P, Gamelin E, Vassal G, Robert J Pathol Oncol Res. 1998; 4(3):171-8.

PMID: 9761935 DOI: 10.1007/BF02905246.


Methotrexate-vindesine association in the treatment of head and neck cancer influence of vindesine on methotrexate's pharmacokinetic behavior.

Lena N, Imbert A, Pignon T, Favre R, Meyer G, Cano J Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1984; 12(2):120-4.

PMID: 6697425 DOI: 10.1007/BF00254603.


References
1.
Bertino J, Fischer G . TECHNIQUES FOR STUDY OF RESISTANCE TO FOLIC ACID ANTAGONISTS. Methods Med Res. 1964; 10:297-307. View

2.
Pinedo H, Chabner B . Role of drug concentration, duration of exposure, and endogenous metabolites in determining methotrexate cytotoxicity. Cancer Treat Rep. 1977; 61(4):709-15. View

3.
Evans W, Pratt C, Taylor R, Barker L, Crom W . Pharmacokinetic monitoring of high-dose methotrexate. Early recognition of high-risk patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1979; 3(3):161-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00262416. View

4.
Lankelma J, van der Klein E, Ramaekers F . The role of 7-hydroxymethotrexate during methotrexate anti-cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 1980; 9(2):133-42. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3835(80)90117-2. View

5.
Goh T, Wong K, Lampkin B, OLeary J, Gnarra D . Evaluation of 24-hour infusion of high-dose methotrexate--pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1979; 3(3):177-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF00262419. View