» Articles » PMID: 7064850

Combined Acebutolol/nifedipine Therapy in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease: Additional Improvement of Ischemia-induced Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Overview
Journal Am J Cardiol
Date 1982 Apr 1
PMID 7064850
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To assess acute hemodynamic effects of combined oral nifedipine (10 mg) and acebutolol (100 mg), 21 patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and stable angina pectoris were studied (three groups of seven randomized patients). Simultaneous hemodynamic and equilibrium radionuclide ejection fraction measurements were performed at rest and during exercise before treatment, 1 hour after administration of nifedipine, acebutolol or a combination of the two and again 1 hour after combined nifedipine and acebutolol. At the same exercise level achieved without drugs, angina, subjectively scored by the patients, decreased significantly after nifedipine, acebutolol and a combination of the two in association with a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (p less than 0.01). There was an additive effect of both drugs on heart rate, systolic blood pressure and therefore the double product (p less than 0.01 each). The negative effects of acute beta receptor blockade on cardiac index, resting ejection fraction and total peripheral resistance were balanced by the vasodilatory action of nifedipine. In patients with borderline heart failure no untoward effects were seen after combined therapy. Thus, acute combined acebutolol/nifedipine therapy in patients with stable angina proved to be hemodynamically superior to therapy with either drug alone and safe even in patients with moderately depressed left ventricular function. This finding provides a basis for appropriately designed long-term studies.

Citing Articles

Amlodipine in patients with angina uncontrolled by atenolol. A double blind placebo controlled cross over trial.

Woodmansey P, Stewart A, Morice A, Channer K Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993; 45(2):107-11.

PMID: 8223829 DOI: 10.1007/BF00315489.


How do calcium antagonists differ in clinical practice?.

Ferrari R, Cucchini F, Bolognesi R, Bachetti T, Boraso A, Bernocchi P Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1994; 8 Suppl 3:565-75.

PMID: 7841090 DOI: 10.1007/BF00877225.


Calcium blockers for cardiac disease: therapeutic implications.

Dodek A, Ruedy J Can Med Assoc J. 1983; 128(8):911-5.

PMID: 6831336 PMC: 1875386.


Haemodynamic dose-response effects of i.v. nicardipine in coronary artery disease.

Silke B, Verma S, Nelson G, Hussain M, Taylor S Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984; 18(5):717-24.

PMID: 6508981 PMC: 1463544. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02534.x.


Acute and chronic haemodynamic and electrophysiological effects of nifedipine in patients receiving atenolol.

Rowland E, Razis P, Sugrue D, Krikler D Br Heart J. 1983; 50(4):383-9.

PMID: 6354228 PMC: 481427. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.50.4.383.