» Articles » PMID: 7049955

E.O.R.T.C. Gnotobiotic Project Group: a Prospective Cooperative Study of Antimicrobial Decontamination in Granulocytopenic Patients. Comparison of Two Different Methods

Overview
Journal Infection
Date 1982 Jan 1
PMID 7049955
Citations 4
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a cooperative and prospectively randomized study, two different methods of antimicrobial decontamination of the digestive tract with oral, nonabsorbable antibiotics were compared in neutropenic patients. In the first treatment group, the antibiotics were selected on the basis of the outcome of sensitivity tests performed on the flora of the patients. The other treatment group was given a standard combination of neomycin, cephaloridin, polymyxin B or E and nystatin or amphotericin B. Complete data from a total of 35 patients were received at the Statistical Center, and a minimum of 1.5 oral washings and faecal samples per week arrived at the Central Bacteriological Laboratory. There was no substantial difference in the clinical parameters of the patients in both treatment groups. Both methods for decontamination were found to be effective. The incidence of acquired infections and the quality of decontamination were almost identical in both groups. As far as the average number of negative cultures per patient is concerned, the results for both treatment groups are well in line with data found in other studies using a combination of gentamicin, vancomycin and nystatin.

Citing Articles

Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy.

Gafter-Gvili A, Fraser A, Paul M, Vidal L, Lawrie T, van de Wetering M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 1:CD004386.

PMID: 22258955 PMC: 4170789. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004386.pub3.


Selective decontamination and the anaerobic faecal flora.

Hazenberg M Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1984; 50(5-6):683-9.

PMID: 6397135 DOI: 10.1007/BF02386233.


Binding to faeces and influence on human anaerobes of antimicrobial agents used for selective decontamination.

Hazenberg M, Van de Boom M, Bakker M, van de Merwe J Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1983; 49(2):111-7.

PMID: 6351739 DOI: 10.1007/BF00393668.


Prevention of infection in acute leukemia: a prospective randomized study on the efficacy of two different drug regimens for antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Kurrle E, Dekker A, Gaus W, Haralambie E, Krieger D, Rozenberg-Arska M Infection. 1986; 14(5):226-32.

PMID: 3491791 DOI: 10.1007/BF01644268.

References
1.
Dietrich M, Gaus W, Vossen J, Van Der Waaij D, Wendt F . Protective isolation and antimicrobial decontamination in patients with high susceptibility to infection. A prospective cooperative study of gnotobiotic care in acute leukemia patients. I: clinical results. Infection. 1977; 5(2):107-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF01642091. View

2.
Schimpff S, Gaya H, Klastersky J, Tattersall M, Zinner S . Three antibiotic regimens in the treatment of infection in febrile granulocytopenic patients with cancer. The EORTC international antimicrobial therapy project group. J Infect Dis. 1978; 137(1):14-29. View

3.
Dankert J, Gaus W, Gaya H, Krieger D, LINZENMEIER G, Van Der Waaij D . Protective isolation and antimicrobial decontamination in patients with high susceptibility to infection. A prospective cooperative study of gnotobiotic care in acute leukaemia patients. III: The quality of isolation and decontamination. Infection. 1978; 6(4):175-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF01641908. View

4.
Dietrich M, Gaus W, Vossen J, Wendt F, Van Der Waaij D . Protocol for a comparative study of two methods for decontamination of the digestive tract. Infection. 1978; 6(2):78-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF01642163. View

5.
YATES J, HOLLAND J . A controlled study of isolation and endogenous microbial suppression in acute myelocytic leukemia patients. Cancer. 1973; 32(6):1490-8. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197312)32:6<1490::aid-cncr2820320628>3.0.co;2-6. View