» Articles » PMID: 7032875

Resistance to Diuretics: Emphasis on a Pharmacological Perspective

Overview
Journal Drugs
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1981 Dec 1
PMID 7032875
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Resistance to diuretics occurs frequently in clinical settings. Most attention to this phenomenon has been directed toward the pathophysiology of the disease state, with little focus on the pharmacology of the diuretics themselves. This review summarises the pathogenesis and emphasises the pharmacological determinants of response to diuretics, including absorption, delivery to the kidney, and response to amounts of diuretic reaching the site of action. In normal subjects, overall response to organic acid diuretics such as frusemide (furosemide) is determined by the total amount of drug delivered into the urine (reflecting amounts of drug reaching the intraluminal site of action), the time course of delivery, and the relationship between amounts of drug reaching the urine and response (the dynamics of response). The conditions of azotaemia, inhibition of synthesis of prostaglandins, and the oedematous disorders of congestive heart failure, cirrhotic liver disease and nephrotic syndrome are examined in the above context. In azotaemic subjects, delivery of organic acid diuretics to their intraluminal site of action is inhibited by accumulated endogenous organic acids which compete for transport into the nephron at the organic acid secretory site of the proximal tubule. Whether the dynamics of response are changed has not been investigated. During inhibition of synthesis of prostaglandins, and in the oedematous disorders, there appear to be no changes in handling of frusemide; i.e. bioavailability, total drug delivered into the urine and the time course of delivery are comparable with that in normal subjects unless concomitant renal dysfunction exists. Resistance in these conditions is therefore due to a change in the dynamics of response.

Citing Articles

Prophylactic furosemide infusion decreasing early major postoperative renal dysfunction in on-pump adult cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Fakhari S, Bavil F, Bilehjani E, Abolhasani S, Mirinazhad M, Naghipour B Res Rep Urol. 2017; 9:5-13.

PMID: 28176949 PMC: 5261850. DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S126134.


Fluid overload in the ICU: evaluation and management.

Claure-Del Granado R, Mehta R BMC Nephrol. 2016; 17(1):109.

PMID: 27484681 PMC: 4970195. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-016-0323-6.


The added-up albumin enhances the diuretic effect of furosemide in patients with hypoalbuminemic chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled study.

Phakdeekitcharoen B, Boonyawat K BMC Nephrol. 2012; 13:92.

PMID: 22931630 PMC: 3538583. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-92.


Plasma protein binding and pharmacological response.

du Souich P, Verges J, Erill S Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993; 24(6):435-40.

PMID: 8513647 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199324060-00001.


Which diuretic to use?.

Swanepoel C Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1994; 8(1):123-8.

PMID: 8086322 DOI: 10.1007/BF00877100.


References
1.
KLINGLER Jr E, VAAMONDE C, Vaamonde L, LANCESTREMERE R, Morosi H, FRISCH E . Renal function changes in cirrhosis of the liver. A prospective study. Arch Intern Med. 1970; 125(6):1010-5. View

2.
Vander A, Malvin R, WILDE W, SULLIVAN L . Localization of the site of action of chlorothiazide by stop-flow analysis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1959; 125(1):19-22. View

3.
Rose H, Pruitt A, MCNAY J . Effect of experimental azotemia on renal clearance of furosemide in the dog. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1976; 196(1):238-47. View

4.
DE WARDENER H . The control of sodium excretion. Am J Physiol. 1978; 235(3):F163-73. DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.1978.235.3.F163. View

5.
Auld R, Alexander E, LEVINSKY N . Proximal tubular function in dogs with thoracic caval constriction. J Clin Invest. 1971; 50(10):2150-8. PMC: 292149. DOI: 10.1172/JCI106709. View