» Articles » PMID: 6975199

Chromosome Banding in Amphibia. VI. BrdU-replication Patterns in Anura and Demonstration of XX/XY Sex Chromosomes in Rana Esculenta

Overview
Journal Chromosoma
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 1981 Jan 1
PMID 6975199
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A modified BrdU-Hoechst-Giemsa technique permitted the demonstration of easily reproducible replication patterns in the somatic chromosomes of Amphibia. These banding patterns allow for the first time a precise identification of all chromosomes and the analysis of the patterns of replication in the various stages of S-phase in Amphibia. Several possibilities for the use of this technique were demonstrated on three frog species of the family Ranidae, all differing greatly in their DNA-content. With this method, the homomorphic chromosome pair No. 4 in Rana esculenta could be identified as sex-specific chromosomes of the XX/XY-type. All male animals exhibit an extremely late replicating region in the Y-chromosome, which is lacking in the X-chromosome in the female animals, both X-chromosomes replicate synchronously. These sex-specific chromosomes cannot be distinguished by other banding techniques. In the highly heteromorphic ZZ/ZW-sex chromosome system of Pyxicephalus adspersus a synchronous replication of the two Z-chromosomes of male animals and a very late replication of the short arm of the W-chromosomes of male animals was demonstrated. These results support the assumption that there is no dosage compensation for Z-linked or X-linked genes by the sex chromosome inactivation mechanism in the sex chromosomes of Amphibia.

Citing Articles

Karyotype analysis of David, 1875 (Anura, Dicroglossidae) with conventional cytogenetic techniques.

Zhang L, Xiang J, Li J, Zhou J, Hou J, Huang Y Comp Cytogenet. 2024; 18:97-103.

PMID: 38948005 PMC: 11214007. DOI: 10.3897/compcytogen.18.116806.


Sex chromosomes in meiotic, hemiclonal, clonal and polyploid hybrid vertebrates: along the 'extended speciation continuum'.

Stock M, Dedukh D, Reifova R, Lamatsch D, Starostova Z, Janko K Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021; 376(1833):20200103.

PMID: 34304588 PMC: 8310718. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0103.


Comparative Distribution of Repetitive Sequences in the Karyotypes of and (Anura, Pipidae).

Roco A, Liehr T, Ruiz-Garcia A, Guzman K, Bullejos M Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(5).

PMID: 33919402 PMC: 8143290. DOI: 10.3390/genes12050617.


Characterization of axolotl lampbrush chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunostaining.

Keinath M, Davidian A, Timoshevskiy V, Timoshevskaya N, Gall J Exp Cell Res. 2021; 401(2):112523.

PMID: 33675804 PMC: 8123938. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112523.


Chromosome evolution in Lophyohylini (Amphibia, Anura, Hylinae).

Suarez P, Ferro J, Nagamachi C, Cardozo D, Blasco-Zuniga A, Silva J PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234331.

PMID: 32525943 PMC: 7289402. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234331.


References
1.
LATT S . Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973; 70(12):3395-9. PMC: 427244. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3395. View

2.
Allen J, LATT S . In vivo BrdU-33258 Hoechst analysis of DNA replication kinetics and sister chromatid exchange formation in mouse somatic and meiotic cells. Chromosoma. 1976; 58(4):325-40. DOI: 10.1007/BF00292841. View

3.
Biederman B, Florence D, Lin C . Cytogenetic analysis of great horned owls (Bubo virginianus). Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1980; 28(1-2):79-86. DOI: 10.1159/000131515. View

4.
Singh L, Purdom I, Jones K . Satellite DNA and evolution of sex chromosomes. Chromosoma. 1976; 59(1):43-62. DOI: 10.1007/BF00327708. View

5.
Vogel W, Bauknecht T . Differential chromatid staining by in vivo treatment as a mutagenicity test system. Nature. 1976; 260(5550):448-9. DOI: 10.1038/260448a0. View