» Articles » PMID: 6870373

The Relationship Between the Extent of Distal Clearance and Survival and Local Recurrence Rates After Curative Anterior Resection for Carcinoma of the Rectum

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 1983 Aug 1
PMID 6870373
Citations 89
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With increasing use of low anterior resection, the length of rectum removed below the tumor is often less than the recommended 2 to 5 cm. It is important to know if this decreases the chance of cure. Between 1963 and 1975, 334 patients survived radical restorative operations for single rectal adenocarcinoma. The length of rectum below the tumor measured on fixed pinned-out pathologic specimens was 2 cm or less in 55 patients (group 1), 2 to 5 cm in 177 (group 2), and 5 cm or more in 102 (group 3). The Dukes' classification, histologic grade, and extent of local spread of the tumors were similar in the three groups. Overall crude 5-year survival rates for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 69.1%, 68.4%, and 69.6%, respectively. Corresponding cancer-specific death rates were 25.5%, 23.2%, and 21.6%. These rates were also similar in matching pathologic subgroups of the three main groups. Of 23 observed or suspected local recurrences, there were four recurrences in group 1 (7.3%), 11 in group 2 (6.2%), and eight in group 3 (7.8%). These results suggest that a margin less than 2 cm below a rectal carcinoma does not affect survival or local recurrence adversely.

Citing Articles

Nonoperative management of rectal cancer.

Williams H, Lee C, Garcia-Aguilar J Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1477510.

PMID: 39711959 PMC: 11659252. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1477510.


Conformal proctectomy with sphincter preservation retains acceptable defecation functions in very low rectal cancer male patients.

Chen W, Zhang X, Qiu X, Zhou J, Lin G Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1478467.

PMID: 39575417 PMC: 11578961. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1478467.


Outcomes of Distal Rectal Cancer Patients Who Did Not Qualify for Watch-and-Wait: Comparison of Intersphincteric Resection Versus Abdominoperineal Resection.

Feferman Y, Verheij F, Williams H, Omer D, Pappou E, Wei I Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(1):128-136.

PMID: 39395915 PMC: 11894814. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16316-3.


Endoscopic ultrasound-guided injection of carbon nanoparticles suspension to label rectal cancer before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Lin N, Wang Y, Yu C, Wu W, Fang Y, Yang J Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023; 11:goad062.

PMID: 37842199 PMC: 10570992. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goad062.


Watch-and-Wait Approach to Rectal Cancer: The Role of Imaging.

Jayaprakasam V, Alvarez J, Omer D, Gollub M, Smith J, Petkovska I Radiology. 2023; 307(1):e221529.

PMID: 36880951 PMC: 10068893. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221529.


References
1.
QUER E, Dahlin D, MAYO C . Retrograde intramural spread of carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid; a microscopic study. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1953; 96(1):24-30. View

2.
MORSON B, Vaughan E, Bussey H . Pelvic Recurrence after Excision of Rectum for Carcinoma. Br Med J. 2010; 2(5348):13-8. PMC: 1872145. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5348.13. View

3.
Nicholls R, Ritchie J, Wadsworth J, Parks A . Total excision or restorative resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1979; 66(9):625-7. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800660908. View

4.
Wilson S, BEAHRS O . The curative treatment of carcinoma of the sigmoid, rectosigmoid, and rectum. Ann Surg. 1976; 183(5):556-65. PMC: 1344346. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197605000-00013. View

5.
Dukes C . Discussion on major surgery in carcinoma of the rectum with or without colostomy, excluding the anal canal and including the rectosigmoid: general results of surgical treatment. Proc R Soc Med. 1957; 50(12):1031-5. PMC: 1889487. View