» Articles » PMID: 686899

Correlation of Estrophilin Content of Primary Mammary Cancer to Eventual Endocrine Treatment

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 1978 Sep 1
PMID 686899
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The estrogen receptor protein content of recurrent breast cancer correlates well with the clinical response of hormonal manipulation. This predictive value of the ER of the primary tumor obtained at the time of mastectomy has not yet been proven. If this predictive capability should hold for primary tumors and eventual endocrine treatment, the ramifications are obvious: endocrine therapy could be offered to patients on a rational basis and adjuvant therapy could be considered on a plausible biochemical basis. This report details our observations as to the ER content of the primary tumor and the eventual result of endocrine therapy. Thirty-seven patients whose tumor ER was determined from the primary tumor eventually underwent some form of endocrine therapy for recurrent disease. Fifteen of the primary tumors had significant ER content and 22 possessed insignificant amounts. Only one of the 22 patients with insignificant ER content was benefited by endocrine treatment. Those patients whose tumors contained low amounts of ER experienced recurrence of their disease more rapidly than did those with higher ER content. There was no correlation of age, cell type of tumor or metastatic site with the ER content of the tumor. There is a positive correlation between response to chemotherapy and ER content of tumor. Measurement of the estrogen receptor protein content of the primary breast tumor is a reliable method for choosing patients for eventual endocrine therapy. Those patients whose tumors contain insignificant estrophilin are not candidates for such attempts at palliation.

Citing Articles

Whole transcriptome RNA-Seq analysis of breast cancer recurrence risk using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue.

Sinicropi D, Qu K, Collin F, Crager M, Liu M, Pelham R PLoS One. 2012; 7(7):e40092.

PMID: 22808097 PMC: 3396611. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040092.


Soluble and nuclear oestrogen receptor status in human breast cancer in relation to prognosis.

Leake R, Laing L, McArdle C, Smith D Br J Cancer. 1981; 43(1):67-71.

PMID: 7459240 PMC: 2010498. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1981.9.


Estrogen receptor status as a prognostic indicator for stage I breast cancer patients.

Crowe J, HUBAY C, Pearson O, Marshall J, Rosenblatt J, Mansour E Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1982; 2(2):171-6.

PMID: 7171837 DOI: 10.1007/BF01806453.


Steroid receptors in meningiomas. A histochemical and biochemical study.

Hinton D, Mobbs E, Sima A, Hanna W Acta Neuropathol. 1983; 62(1-2):134-40.

PMID: 6659871 DOI: 10.1007/BF00684930.


Influence of the menstrual cycle on the concentrations of estrogen and progesterone receptors in primary breast cancer biopsies.

Smyth C, Benn D, Reeve T Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1988; 11(1):45-50.

PMID: 3382762 DOI: 10.1007/BF01807557.


References
1.
FOLCA P, GLASCOCK R, Irvine W . Studies with tritium-labelled hexoestrol in advanced breast cancer. Comparison of tissue accumulation of hexoestrol with response to bilateral adrenalectomy and oophorectomy. Lancet. 1961; 2(7206):796-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(61)91088-1. View

2.
Huggins C, DAO T . Characteristics of adrenal-dependent mammary cancers. Ann Surg. 1954; 140(4):497-501. PMC: 1609829. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-195410000-00005. View

3.
JENSEN E, Smith S, Desombre E . Hormone dependency in breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem. 1976; 7(11-12):911-7. DOI: 10.1016/0022-4731(76)90010-8. View

4.
Wittliff J, Beatty B, SAVLOV E, PATTERSON W, COOPER Jr R . Estrogen receptors and hormone dependency in human breast cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1976; (57):59-77. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81043-5_7. View

5.
Bonadonna G, Rossi A, Valagussa P, Banfi A, Veronesi U . The CMF program for operable breast cancer with positive axillary nodes. Updated analysis on the disease-free interval, site of relapse and drug tolerance. Cancer. 1977; 39(6 Suppl):2904-15. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197706)39:6<2904::aid-cncr2820390677>3.0.co;2-8. View