» Articles » PMID: 6814301

Analgesic and Respiratory Depressant Activity of Nalbuphine: a Comparison with Morphine

Overview
Journal Anesthesiology
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 1982 Nov 1
PMID 6814301
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To compare the respiratory depressant and analgesic effects of nalbuphine and morphine, six healthy male subjects were given the drugs as single 0.15-mg/kg doses, and as four successive doses of 0.15 mg/kg. Respiratory depression was monitored by ventilatory and mouth occlusion pressure responses during CO2 rebreathing, while analgesia to experimental pain was tested with the submaximal effort tourniquet ischemia test. When given as single 0.15 mg/kg doses, both drugs significantly increases the threshold and tolerance for experimental pain. The analgesic effect was similar for both drugs at this dosage, as was depression of the ventilatory and occlusion pressure responses to CO2. Morphine administered in multiple doses progressively increased pain tolerance from 30 +/- 13% above control with the first dose of 0.15 mg/kg to 107 +/- 13% above control after the fourth dose (cumulative total 0.60 mg/kg). Nalbuphine produced a 40 +/- 12% increase in pain tolerance with an initial dose of 0.15 mg/kg, but additional increments of nalbuphine did not result in significantly greater analgesia. The increasing morphine dosage was associated with progressive rightward displacements and ultimately decreases in the slope of the CO2 response curves. Nalbuphine produced an initial rightward displacement of the CO2 response curves similar to morphine, but continued administration of the drug did not result in further displacement or changes in slope. These findings demonstrate that nalbuphine, in contrast to morphine, exhibits a ceiling effect for respiratory depression which is paralleled by its limited analgesic effect on experimental pain.

Citing Articles

Comparison of postoperative analgesia and side effects in pediatric laparoscopic surgery with morphine and nalbuphine.

Chen J, Wang C, Zhong J, Cai Y, Zhang J, Wang F iScience. 2024; 27(3):109287.

PMID: 38496295 PMC: 10943434. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109287.


Efficacy and safety comparison of esketamine-propofol with nalbuphine-propofol for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in children: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Zheng X, Huang J, Wei S, Tao Y, Shen Y, Wang Y Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1126522.

PMID: 37441574 PMC: 10333751. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1126522.


Pain management of nalbuphine and sufentanil in patients admitted intensive care unit of different ages.

Ji K, Gong X, Luan T, Gao X, Zang B BMC Emerg Med. 2022; 22(1):50.

PMID: 35346051 PMC: 8961885. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-022-00592-x.


Application of Nalbuphine in Trigeminal Ganglion Pulse Radiofrequency Surgery in Patients with Postherpetic Neuralgia.

Wen S, Xiao Q, Zhu Z, Chen L, Li Y, Ran Q Pain Res Manag. 2021; 2021:6623112.

PMID: 33747319 PMC: 7943312. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6623112.


Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effects Between Nalbuphine and Fentanyl in Children Undergoing Adenotonsillectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study.

Chen F, Wang C, Zhang J, Wang F, Zhang M, Gu H Front Pharmacol. 2021; 11:597550.

PMID: 33536911 PMC: 7849154. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.597550.