Animal Models of Intra-oral Chemical Carcinogenesis: a Review
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Early attempts to induce malignant oral tumours were largely unsuccessful, as the oral mucosa is considerably more resistant to the actions of chemical carcinogens than skin. The first consistent success came when strong carcinogens were applied to the hamster cheek pouch. This model remains the most popular for studies of intra-oral carcinogenesis and is discussed at length. The advantages and disadvantages are critically reviewed. The models of intra-oral carcinogenesis in extra-pouch sites in the hamster, mouse, rat and nonhuman primates are considered. The possible reasons for the relative resistance of oral mucosa to chemical carcinogens are discussed, particularly in relation to portals of entry and saliva. Finally, the relative merits of the more popular models of intra-oral carcinogenesis are briefly discussed.
Tinhofer I, Braunholz D, Klinghammer K Cancers Head Neck. 2020; 5:9.
PMID: 32714605 PMC: 7376675. DOI: 10.1186/s41199-020-00056-4.
Immunocompromised and immunocompetent mouse models for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Lei Z, Ren X, Wang S, Liang X, Tang Y Onco Targets Ther. 2016; 9:545-55.
PMID: 26869799 PMC: 4734789. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S95633.
Heber E, Hawthorne M, Kueffer P, Garabalino M, Thorp S, Pozzi E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(45):16077-81.
PMID: 25349432 PMC: 4234606. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1410865111.
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of lyophilized bovine bone biocompatibility.
Galia C, Macedo C, Rosito R, Mello T, Camargo L, Moreira L Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008; 63(6):801-6.
PMID: 19061004 PMC: 2664282. DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322008000600016.
Sacks P Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1996; 15(1):27-51.
PMID: 8842478 DOI: 10.1007/BF00049486.