» Articles » PMID: 6781183

Functional Morphology and Evolutionary Biology

Overview
Journal Acta Biotheor
Publisher Springer
Specialty Biology
Date 1980 Jan 1
PMID 6781183
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study the relationship between functional morpholoy and evolutionary biology is analysed by confronting the main concepts in both disciplines. Rather than only discussing this connection theoretically, the analysis is carried out by introducing important practical and experimental studies, which use aspects from both disciplines. The mentioned investigations are methodologically analysed and the consequences for extensions of the relationship are worked out. It can be shown that both disciplines have a large domain of their own and also share a large common ground. Many disagreements among evolutionary biologists can be reduced to differences in general philosophy (idealism vs. realism), selection of phenomenona (structure vs. function), definition of concepts (natural selection) and the position of the concept theory as an explaining factor (neutralists vs selectionist, random variation, determinate selection, etc.). The significance of functional morphology for evolutionary biology, and vice versa depends on these differences. For a neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory, contributions from functional and ecological morphology are indispensable. Of ultimate importance are the notions of internal selection and constraints in the constructions determining further development. In this context the concepts of random variation and natural selection need more detailed definition. The study ends with a recommendation for future research founded in a system-theoretical or structuralistic conception.

Citing Articles

Studies of the Behavioral Sequences: The Neuroethological Morphology Concept Crossing Ethology and Functional Morphology.

Bels V, Pallandre J, Pelle E, Kirchhoff F Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(11).

PMID: 35681801 PMC: 9179564. DOI: 10.3390/ani12111336.


Evolutionary morphology and Evo-devo: hierarchy and novelty.

Love A Theory Biosci. 2006; 124(3-4):317-33.

PMID: 17046363 DOI: 10.1016/j.thbio.2005.11.006.


On a functional-morphological approach to phylogenetic reconstruction: a critique.

Sluys R Acta Biotheor. 1983; 32(1):29-41.

PMID: 6410632 DOI: 10.1007/BF00047973.


Constructional morphology: the analysis of constraints in evolution dedicated to A. Seilacher in honour of his 60. birthday.

Reif W, Thomas R, Fischer M Acta Biotheor. 1985; 34(2-4):233-48.

PMID: 3933231 DOI: 10.1007/BF00046787.

References
1.
Weijs W . Mandibular movements of the albino rat during feeding. J Morphol. 1975; 145(1):107-24. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051450107. View

2.
REED E . Darwin's evolutionary philosophy: the laws of change. Acta Biotheor. 1978; 27(3-4):201-35. DOI: 10.1007/BF00115834. View

3.
Allin E . Evolution of the mammalian middle ear. J Morphol. 1975; 147(4):403-37. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051470404. View

4.
Lombard R, Wake D . Tongue evolution in the lungless salamanders, family plethodontidae. I. Introduction, theory and a general model of dynamics. J Morphol. 1976; 148(3):265-86. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051480302. View

5.
Lehmann H, Joysey K, Friday A . On the evolution of myoglobin. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978; 283(995):61-163. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1978.0018. View