» Articles » PMID: 6725787

Self-control Behavior in Hyperactive and Nonhyperactive Children

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 1984 Jun 1
PMID 6725787
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was aimed at evaluating the self-control behaviors of hyperactive (HA) and nonhyperactive ( NHA ) first-grade pupils under conditions of repeated failure on a previously learned concept formation task. Subjects were divided into HA and NHA groups on the basis of their scores on the Conners (1969) Teacher Rating Scale. During the training stage of the experiment the children learned a concept formation task under a schedule of contingent positive reinforcement. In the test stage they performed the same task but under a negative noncontingent reinforcement schedule. The results revealed no differences in initial rate of learning the task between the groups. After the introduction of the negative noncontingent reinforcement schedule, however, the HA group showed a marked decrease in the use of effective problem-solving strategies. The HA children's performance on the concept formation task was accompanied by the emission of negative self-evaluations and solution-irrelevant statements. The NHA group used significantly more statements showing useful goal-directed cognitive mediations than the HA children. The results suggested that HA children may have deficits in self-control skills.

Citing Articles

Parents' perspectives on a smartwatch intervention for children with ADHD: Rapid deployment and feasibility evaluation of a pilot intervention to support distance learning during COVID-19.

Cibrian F, Monteiro E, Ankrah E, Beltran J, Tavakoulnia A, Schuck S PLoS One. 2021; 16(10):e0258959.

PMID: 34705845 PMC: 8550607. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258959.


Shortened conditioned eyeblink response latency in male but not female Wistar-Kyoto hyperactive rats.

Thanellou A, Schachinger K, Green J Behav Neurosci. 2009; 123(3):650-64.

PMID: 19485572 PMC: 3998652. DOI: 10.1037/a0015567.


Task switching and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Cepeda N, Cepeda M, Kramer A J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2000; 28(3):213-26.

PMID: 10885680 DOI: 10.1023/a:1005143419092.


Effects of reward and response cost on response inhibition in AD/HD, disruptive, anxious, and normal children.

Oosterlaan J, Sergeant J J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1998; 26(3):161-74.

PMID: 9650623 DOI: 10.1023/a:1022650216978.


Visual and auditory attention performance in hyperactive children: competence or compliance.

Draeger S, Prior M, Sanson A J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1986; 14(3):411-24.

PMID: 3760347 DOI: 10.1007/BF00915435.

References
1.
Kupietz S, BIALER I, Winsberg H . A behavior rating scale for assessing improvement in behaviorally deviant children: a preliminary investigation. Am J Psychiatry. 1972; 128(11):1432-6. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.128.11.1432. View

2.
Kendall P, Brophy C . Activity and attentional correlates of teacher ratings of hyperactivity. J Pediatr Psychol. 1981; 6(4):451-8. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/6.4.451. View

3.
Conners C . A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children. Am J Psychiatry. 1969; 126(6):884-8. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.126.6.884. View

4.
Copeland A . Types of private speech produced by hyperactive and nonhyperactive boys. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1979; 7(2):169-77. DOI: 10.1007/BF00918897. View

5.
Tant J, Douglas V . Problem solving in hyperactive, normal, and reading-disabled boys. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1982; 10(3):285-306. DOI: 10.1007/BF00912323. View