» Articles » PMID: 6713092

Prognostic Relevance of Cellular Morphology in Multiple Myeloma

Overview
Journal Blood
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Hematology
Date 1984 May 1
PMID 6713092
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Morphological characteristics of tumor cells have been employed in the prognosis of lymphomas and solid tumors. This report documents an attempt to predict survival from the known cytologic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma. Myeloma cells in bone marrow smears from patients at diagnosis were evaluated by assigning them to morphologically defined categories. Cox's multivariate regression model for censored survival data was used to generate optimal weights, which served as coefficients in two regression equations to estimate death risk from cellular morphology. Step-wise procedures excluded redundant parameters. "Myeloma morphology score" (MMS) discriminates significantly (p less than 0.0001) among 3 stages, with median survival times of 42.5, 30.7, and 9.1 mo. For clinical routine application, "myeloma progression score" (MPS), the weight sum of the proportion of plasmablasts and the extent of bone marrow plasma cell infiltration, is suggested as a simple prognostic tool. Its discriminative power is very high [p less than 10(-9)]. Median survival times of greater than 71.5, 23.4, and 6.1 mo were found for good, moderate, and poor risk groups, respectively. However, staging is not confined to three subgroups, grouping is flexible, and pairs of data can be matched. This fact may prove to be valuable in designing prognosis-controlled clinical trials or theoretical studies on cellular differentiation. Preliminary results suggest changes in morphology due to disease progression and/or the effect of therapy on tumor kinetics. Most importantly, staging according to MPS or MMS may facilitate the adaption of therapy to the current state of the disease in patients with multiple myeloma.

Citing Articles

2,4-Dihydroxy-3'-methoxy-4'-ethoxychalcone suppresses cell proliferation and induces apoptosis of multiple myeloma the PI3K/akt/mTOR signaling pathway.

Zhu F, Jiang D, Zhang M, Zhao B Pharm Biol. 2019; 57(1):641-648.

PMID: 31564190 PMC: 6781472. DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2019.1662814.


Integration of conventional cell viability assays for reliable and reproducible read-outs: experimental evidence.

Garg S, Huifu H, Kaul S, Wadhwa R BMC Res Notes. 2018; 11(1):403.

PMID: 29929534 PMC: 6013999. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3512-5.


Cytology and clinical features of myelomatous pleural effusion: Three case reports and a review of the literature.

Chen H, Li P, Xie Y, Jin M Diagn Cytopathol. 2018; 46(7):604-609.

PMID: 29400006 PMC: 6033182. DOI: 10.1002/dc.23894.


Multiple myeloma: Defining the high-risk patient and determining the optimal treatment strategy.

Schecter J, Lentzsch S Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2013; 8(4):277-83.

PMID: 24158405 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-013-0183-0.


A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.

Grignani G, Gobbi P, Formisano R, Pieresca C, Ucci G, Brugnatelli S Br J Cancer. 1996; 73(9):1101-7.

PMID: 8624271 PMC: 2074407. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.212.