» Articles » PMID: 6700054

Problems in the Identification of Potential Organ Donors. Misconceptions and Fallacies Associated with Donor Cards

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1984 Mar 23
PMID 6700054
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A survey of organ procurement programs and district attorneys' offices was undertaken in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine to what extent organ donor cards were effective in obtaining organs for purposes of transplantation. Results of the survey revealed that all 50 states and the District of Columbia have adopted some form of the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA), but in 47 states, even when a signed donor card is available, surgeons still require family approval for removal of organs despite the fact that the provisions of the UAGA do not require this. In addition, it was found that while 44 states have a provision on their permanent drivers' licenses for organ donation, no state requires drivers to indicate whether they want to donate organs. While there is little information on the number of persons who actually carry donor cards, four states indicated that between 1.7% and 8.5% of their drivers were designated as donors. In Colorado, however, it was reported that 60% of all drivers are designated as donors. Nevertheless, in all states it was determined that few actual donors were carrying donor cards at the time of their death. It must therefore be concluded that while donor cards are an excellent educational medium and certainly facilitate the activities of transplant coordination, they are not an effective means of substantially increasing the supply of organs for transplantation.

Citing Articles

Donor conversion and procurement failure: the fate of our potential organ donors.

Branco B, Inaba K, Lam L, Salim A, Barmparas G, Teixeira P World J Surg. 2010; 35(2):440-5.

PMID: 21128074 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0870-0.


Winning hearts and minds: using psychology to promote voluntary organ donation.

Farsides T Health Care Anal. 2001; 8(2):101-21.

PMID: 11183441 DOI: 10.1023/A:1009402628830.


Respect for donor choice and the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act.

Edinger W J Med Humanit. 1991; 11(3):135-42.

PMID: 10107286 DOI: 10.1007/BF01149321.


Medical, ethical, and legal implications of current trends in clinical transplantation: an assessment of the respective roles of government and the private sector in the regulation of transplantation.

RAPAPORT F, Miller C, Starzl T Transplant Proc. 1987; 19(4):3525-7.

PMID: 3617210 PMC: 2904673.


Pew Memorial Trust policy synthesis: 5. State coverage for organ transplantation: a framework for decision making.

Lindsey P, McGlynn E Health Serv Res. 1988; 22(6):881-922.

PMID: 3279012 PMC: 1065481.