» Articles » PMID: 6689650

Significance of Ventricular Arrhythmias Initiated by Programmed Ventricular Stimulation: the Importance of the Type of Ventricular Arrhythmia Induced and the Number of Premature Stimuli Required

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 1984 Jan 1
PMID 6689650
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An increasing number of premature ventricular stimuli are being used during programmed stimulation of the heart in the investigation of patients with documented or suspected ventricular arrhythmias. To analyze the significance of the different types of ventricular arrhythmias that are initiated, we evaluated in a prospective study the effect of from one to four ventricular premature stimuli in 52 patients without (non-VT group) and 50 patients with (prior-VT group) documented ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. More than half of the patients in the prior-VT group had coronary heart disease. In the majority of patients of the non-VT group the heart was normal. In 44 of the 50 patients in the prior-VT group the clinically documented ventricular arrhythmia was initiated by programmed ventricular stimulation of the heart. In 88% of these 44 patients, one or two ventricular premature beats were required to initiate the clinical arrhythmia. A ventricular arrhythmia could be initiated in 31 of the 52 patients in the non-VT group. The ventricular arrhythmias included nonsustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (two patients), six to 25 complexes of sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (24 patients), and ventricular fibrillation (five patients). In 70% of patients in the non-VT group three or four ventricular premature beats were required to initiate the ventricular arrhythmia. Our results indicate that not only the number of extrastimuli required to initiate ventricular arrhythmias but also the type of ventricular arrhythmia initiated differed between the two groups of patients. Nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation are nonspecific responses to aggressive stimulation protocols.

Citing Articles

The Prognostic Role of Programmed Ventricular Stimulation in the Risk Stratification of Sudden Cardiac Death.

Iavarone M, Rago A, Molinari R, DAndrea A, Nesti M, Muscoli S Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(5):152.

PMID: 39076736 PMC: 11273013. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2405152.


Prognosis of programmed ventricular stimulation in adult patients with syncope of unexplained origin: A historical cohort.

Finkler B, SantAnna R, Pinos J, Zanotta D, Moreira T, de Jesus F J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(1):124-130.

PMID: 38333395 PMC: 10848573. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12953.


Intracardiac electrophysiology to characterize susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias in murine models.

Ferrand M, Giordano G, Mougenot N, Laporte P, Vignier N, Leclerc A Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1326663.

PMID: 38322613 PMC: 10846502. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1326663.


Arrhythmic syncope: From diagnosis to management.

Francisco Pascual J, Jordan Marchite P, Rodriguez Silva J, Rivas Gandara N World J Cardiol. 2023; 15(4):119-141.

PMID: 37124975 PMC: 10130893. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i4.119.


Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with Heart Disease and Preserved Systolic Function: Current Options for Risk Stratification.

Pannone L, Falasconi G, Cianfanelli L, Baldetti L, Moroni F, Spoladore R J Clin Med. 2021; 10(9).

PMID: 33922111 PMC: 8122448. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091823.