» Articles » PMID: 6648855

Rapid Method for Measurement of Bronchial Responsiveness

Overview
Journal Thorax
Date 1983 Oct 1
PMID 6648855
Citations 148
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A rapid, simple method for measuring bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine is described. The method was used to obtain dose response curves in 50 atopic subjects with varying respiratory and nasal symptoms. The cumulative dose of histamine which caused a 20% fall in the one second forced expiratory volume (PD20-FEV1) varied between 0.046 and greater than 3.9 mumol and correlated with the severity of symptoms. The reproducibility of the PD20-FEV1, determined from duplicate measurements in 15 subjects with varying degrees of bronchial responsiveness was found to be satisfactory. When the PD20-FEV1 from this rapid method was compared with that obtained from the dosimeter method no significant difference was found. The dose delivered by this method was shown to be cumulative.

Citing Articles

Allergic sensitization to lipocalins reflects asthma morbidity in dog dander sensitized children.

Kack U, van Hage M, Gronlund H, Lilja G, Asarnoj A, Konradsen J Clin Transl Allergy. 2022; 12(5):e12149.

PMID: 35510076 PMC: 9058535. DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12149.


Inhalation Challenge Tests in Occupational Asthma: Why Are Multiple Tests Needed?.

Akgunduz Uzmezoglu B Turk Thorac J. 2021; 22(2):154-162.

PMID: 33871340 PMC: 8051293. DOI: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.20007.


-based asthma management results in faster improvement of airway hyperresponsiveness.

Bernholm K, Homoe A, Meteran H, Jensen C, Porsbjerg C, Backer V ERJ Open Res. 2018; 4(4).

PMID: 30302333 PMC: 6168761. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00147-2017.


Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: prevalence, pathophysiology, patient impact, diagnosis and management.

Aggarwal B, Mulgirigama A, Berend N NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2018; 28(1):31.

PMID: 30108224 PMC: 6092370. DOI: 10.1038/s41533-018-0098-2.


Forced expiration measurements in mouse models of obstructive and restrictive lung diseases.

Devos F, Maaske A, Robichaud A, Pollaris L, Seys S, Lopez C Respir Res. 2017; 18(1):123.

PMID: 28629359 PMC: 5477381. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-017-0610-1.


References
1.
Chai H, Farr R, Froehlich L, Mathison D, McLean J, Rosenthal R . Standardization of bronchial inhalation challenge procedures. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1975; 56(4):323-7. DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(75)90107-4. View

2.
Cockcroft D, Killian D, Mellon J, Hargreave F . Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey. Clin Allergy. 1977; 7(3):235-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1977.tb01448.x. View

3.
Beaupre A, Malo J . Comparison of histamine bronchial challenges with the Wright nebulizer and the dosimeter. Clin Allergy. 1979; 9(6):575-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1979.tb00482.x. View

4.
Ryan G, Dolovich M, Roberts R, Frith P, Juniper E, Hargreave F . Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: two techniques of aerosol generation and inhalation compared. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981; 123(2):195-9. DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1981.123.2.195. View

5.
Neijens H, Hofkamp M, Degenhart H, Kerrebijn K . Bronchial responsiveness as a function of inhaled histamine and the methods of measurement. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1982; 18(3):427-38. View