» Articles » PMID: 6621080

Warm Induction of Cardioplegia with Glutamate-enriched Blood in Coronary Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Who Are Dependent on Inotropic Drugs and Intra-aortic Balloon Support

Overview
Date 1983 Oct 1
PMID 6621080
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This report reviews the initial clinical application of our experimental studies inducing cardioplegia with a warm (37 degrees C) glutamate-enriched blood solution in ischemically damaged hearts. Over 15 months, 23 consecutive coronary patients requiring preoperative intra-aortic balloon and inotropic drug support for cardiogenic shock underwent operation for left ventricular power failure. Twelve patients were given a warm glutamate-enriched blood cardioplegic solution during the first 5 minutes of aortic clamping before multidose cold (4 degrees C) glutamate blood cardioplegia was begun; 11 patients received standard multidose cold blood cardioplegia without glutamate. All patients had comparably depressed left ventricular performance preoperatively despite maximal inotropic and balloon support and showed evidence of extending myocardial infarction. They did not differ in the number of grafts placed (3.7 +/- 0.2), associated valve and aneurysm procedures (seven patients) or cross-clamp time (89 +/- 6 minutes). All patients received warm blood cardioplegic reperfusion before aortic unclamping. The perioperative mortality was 9% (2/23); both patients who died received cold blood cardioplegia without glutamate. In addition to lower mortality, patients receiving warm glutamate blood cardioplegia exhibited better hemodynamics, allowing earlier discontinuation of inotropic drug infusion (1.3 +/- 0.5 versus 2.7 +/- 0.8 days, p less than 0.05) and intraaortic balloon support (1.2 +/- 0.2 versus 3.6 +/- 0.5 days, p less than 0.05). Late mortality was 30%, resulting in a 65% overall survival rate (2 to 15 months) for the entire series of patients. The operative principles evolving from this early experience include (1) warm blood cardioplegic induction, (2) glutamate enrichment, (3) meticulous attention to cardioplegic distribution and grafting sequence, (4) warm cardioplegic reperfusion before unclamping, and (5) graft perfusion during construction of proximal anastomoses. Hopefully, further application of these techniques will improve results in these extremely high risk coronary patients requiring operation.

Citing Articles

Warm Blood Cardioplegia for Myocardial Protection: Concepts and Controversies.

James T, Nores M, Rousou J, Lin N, Stamou S Tex Heart Inst J. 2020; 47(2):108-116.

PMID: 32603472 PMC: 7328091. DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-18-6909.


Warm blood cardioplegia versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia for myocardial protection during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

Nardi P, Pisano C, Bertoldo F, Vacirca S, Saitto G, Costantino A Cell Death Discov. 2018; 4:23.

PMID: 29531820 PMC: 5841304. DOI: 10.1038/s41420-018-0031-z.


Myocardial protection in cardiac surgery: a historical review from the beginning to the current topics.

Yamamoto H, Yamamoto F Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 61(9):485-96.

PMID: 23877427 DOI: 10.1007/s11748-013-0279-4.


Back to the stacks--looking at classic papers related to the current practice of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Sistino J J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011; 42(4):265-7.

PMID: 21313923 PMC: 4680014.


Cardiopulmonary bypass and plasma taurine.

Irita K, Yoshitake S, Okabe H, Shafiq J, Mohammad T, Yoshitake J J Anesth. 1993; 7(3):352-6.

PMID: 15278823 DOI: 10.1007/s0054030070352.