» Articles » PMID: 6615054

Abdominosacral Resection for Midrectal Cancer. A Fifteen-year Experience

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 1983 Sep 1
PMID 6615054
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

From 1966 to 1981, 646 patients underwent resection for primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum by one surgeon (S.A.L.) in one hospital. The operation, selected by preoperative sigmoidoscopic measurement, was anterior resection (ASR) in 320 patients, abdominosacral resection (ASR) in 175 patients, and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in 151 patients. The operative mortality rate was 2% following each of the operations. Anastomotic complications occurred in less than 2% after AR and in 9.7% after ASR. All patients were completely continent of stool and flatus after AR and ASR. Follow-up is complete in 419 of 427 patients treated from 1966 to 1976. Five-year survival for curative resection (no distant metastases) was 66.2% after AR (129/195), 62.9% after ASR (56/89), and 43.4% after APR (33/76). For patients with no tumor in lymph nodes, survival rates were 73.9% in AR, 75% for ASR, and 59.5% for APR. With involvement of regional lymph nodes, survival fell to 45.2% in AR, 37.9% for ASR, and 17.7% for APR. Pelvic recurrence was detected in 13.3% after AR, 14.6% after ASR, and 13.2% after APR. The authors believe that for midrectal cancer, ASR is the most reliable sphincter-saving procedure. It affords maximum exposure for wide resection of the tumor and safe anastomosis without disrupting the anal sphincters and their innervation. Sphincter preservation can be consistently preserved with no apparent increase in the risk of local recurrence or death from cancer.

Citing Articles

Sphincter-saving surgeries for rectal cancer: A single center study from Kashmir.

Mir S, Chowdri N, Parray F, Mir P, Bashir Y, Nafae M South Asian J Cancer. 2014; 2(4):227-31.

PMID: 24455643 PMC: 3889046. DOI: 10.4103/2278-330X.119929.


Total rectal resection, mesorectum excision, and coloendoanal anastomosis: a therapeutic option for the treatment of low rectal cancer.

Leo E, Belli F, Andreola S, Baldini M, Gallino G, Giovanazzi R Ann Surg Oncol. 1996; 3(4):336-43.

PMID: 8790845 DOI: 10.1007/BF02305662.


Is transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) a valid treatment for rectal tumors?.

Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, Paganini A, Feliciotti F, DI PIETRANTONJ F Surg Endosc. 1996; 10(7):736-41.

PMID: 8662430 DOI: 10.1007/BF00193047.


Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer.

McCall J, Cox M, Wattchow D Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995; 10(3):126-32.

PMID: 7561427 DOI: 10.1007/BF00298532.


A 5- to 21-year follow-up and analysis of 250 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

Michelassi F, Block G, Vannucci L, Montag A, Chappell R Ann Surg. 1988; 208(3):379-89.

PMID: 3421761 PMC: 1493650. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198809000-00016.


References
1.
Parks A . Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med. 1972; 65(11):975-6. PMC: 1644685. View

2.
Lockhart-Mummery H, Ritchie J, HAWLEY P . The results of surgical treatment for carcinoma of the rectum of St Mark's Hospital from 1948 to 1972. Br J Surg. 1976; 63(9):673-7. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800630902. View

3.
Mason A . Transsphincteric approach to rectal lesions. Surg Annu. 1977; 9:171-94. View

4.
LOCALIO S, Eng K, Gouge T, Ranson J . Abdominosacral resection for carcinoma of the midrectum: ten years experience. Ann Surg. 1978; 188(4):475-80. PMC: 1396833. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197810000-00005. View

5.
Goligher J . Use of circular stapling gun with peranal insertion of anorectal purse-string suture for construction of very low colorectal or colo-anal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1979; 66(7):501-4. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800660714. View