» Articles » PMID: 6557139

The Elasticity of Relaxed Insect Fibrillar Flight Muscle

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1983 Oct 1
PMID 6557139
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The mechanical properties of glycerol-extracted fibres from the dorsal longitudinal muscle of Lethocerus have been determined by sinusoidal and transient analysis in the time range 1 ms-1000 s, and from rest length to 10% strain for fibres in relaxing and rigor solutions. The fibres behave reversibly up to strains of about 5%, but reach an elastic limit in the range 5-9% strain, depending upon the rate of strain. Electron micrographs of fibres at different degrees of stretch, and after partial extraction of the contractile proteins, suggest that a connexion between the end of the A filament and the Z line, named a C filament, is responsible for the high stiffness of the relaxed muscle. Estimates are made of the compliance of the A, I and C filaments. The mechanical response of the relaxed muscle, over the entire frequency range studied, is assignable to the C filaments. An analysis of the stiffness of the fibres at different tensions in activating and relaxing solutions, and in fibres relaxed by orthovanadate, shows that the C filaments still exert their mechanical effect in the active muscle. That is, the response of the active muscle consists of the contribution from the cross-bridges plus that of the C filaments, acting mechanically in parallel. This situation is incompatible with earlier explanations of the fully activated mechanical dynamics of fibrillar muscle. Alternative explanations at the cross-bridge level are described in the paper that follows this one.

Citing Articles

The self-oscillation paradox in the flight motor of .

Pons A J R Soc Interface. 2023; 20(208):20230421.

PMID: 37963559 PMC: 10645510. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0421.


Indirect actuation reduces flight power requirements in via elastic energy exchange.

Gau J, Gravish N, Sponberg S J R Soc Interface. 2019; 16(161):20190543.

PMID: 31847756 PMC: 6936040. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0543.


Molecular analysis of the muscle protein projectin in Lepidoptera.

Ayme-Southgate A, Turner L, Southgate R J Insect Sci. 2013; 13:88.

PMID: 24206568 PMC: 3835035. DOI: 10.1673/031.013.8801.


Thick-to-thin filament surface distance modulates cross-bridge kinetics in Drosophila flight muscle.

Tanner B, Farman G, Irving T, Maughan D, Palmer B, Miller M Biophys J. 2012; 103(6):1275-84.

PMID: 22995500 PMC: 3447602. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.08.014.


Mechanical analysis of Drosophila indirect flight and jump muscles.

Swank D Methods. 2011; 56(1):69-77.

PMID: 22079350 PMC: 3288703. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.10.015.


References
1.
GARAMVOLGYI N . The arrangement of the myofilaments in the insect flight muscle. I. J Ultrastruct Res. 1965; 13(5):409-24. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5320(65)90004-3. View

2.
Ford L, HUXLEY A, Simmons R . The relation between stiffness and filament overlap in stimulated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1981; 311:219-49. PMC: 1275407. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013582. View

3.
Bullard B, Hammond K, Luke B . The site of paramyosin in insect flight muscle and the presence of an unidentified protein between myosin filaments and Z-line. J Mol Biol. 1977; 115(3):417-40. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90163-2. View

4.
Kuhn H . Tension transients in fibrillar muscle fibres as affected by stretch-dependent binding of AMP-PNP: a teinochemical effect?. Biophys Struct Mech. 1978; 4(3):209-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF02426086. View

5.
Pringle J . The contractile mechanism of insect fibrillar muscle. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1967; 17:1-60. DOI: 10.1016/0079-6107(67)90003-x. View