The Effects of Angle-arm Length on Judgments of Angle Magnitude and Orientation Contrast

Overview

Journal Percept Psychophys

Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology

Date 1984 Dec 1

PMID 6535099

Citations 6

Authors

P Wenderoth

M Johnson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

The statistical shape of geometric reasoning.

Hart Y, Dillon M, Marantan A, Cardenas A, Spelke E, Mahadevan L Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):12906.

PMID: 30150653 PMC: 6110727. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30314-y.

Outline- and solid-angle orientation illusions have different determinants.

Wenderoth P, OConnor T Percept Psychophys. 1987; 41(1):45-52.

PMID: 3822743 DOI: 10.3758/bf03208212.

The tilt illusion as a function of the relative and absolute lengths of test and inducing lines.

Wenderoth P, OConnor T, Johnson M Percept Psychophys. 1986; 39(5):339-45.

PMID: 3737365 DOI: 10.3758/bf03203001.

Expansion and contraction of outline and solid acute angles: effects of angle magnitude, type of display, and the nature of the matching task.

Wenderoth P, OConnor T, Johnson M Percept Psychophys. 1986; 39(4):261-6.

PMID: 3737354 DOI: 10.3758/bf03204933.

Orientation specificity of length assimilation and contrast.

Jordan K, Haleblian J Percept Psychophys. 1988; 43(5):446-56.

PMID: 3380635 DOI: 10.3758/bf03207880.

References

Bouma H, Andriessen J . Perceived orientation of isolated line segments. Vision Res. 1968; 8(5):493-507. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90091-6. View

Hotopf W, Hibberd M, Brown S . Position in the visual field and spatial expansion. Perception. 1983; 12(4):469-76. DOI: 10.1068/p120469. View

Carpenter R, Blakemore C . Interactions between orientations in human vision. Exp Brain Res. 1973; 18(3):287-303. DOI: 10.1007/BF00234599. View

OToole B, Wenderoth P . The tilt illusion: repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian. Vision Res. 1977; 17(3):367-74. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90025-6. View

Wenderoth P, Beh H, White D . Perceptual distortion of an oblique line in the presence of an abutting vertical line. Vision Res. 1978; 18(8):923-30. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90019-6. View

Hubel D, Wiesel T . Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol. 1968; 195(1):215-43. PMC: 1557912. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008455. View

CORNSWEET T . The staircrase-method in psychophysics. Am J Psychol. 1962; 75:485-91. View

Wenderoth P, Johnson M . What is the appropriate control for the tilt illusion?. Perception. 1985; 14(3):275-83. DOI: 10.1068/p140275. View

Benevento L, CREUTZFELDT O, Kuhnt U . Significance of intracortical inhibition in the visual cortex. Nat New Biol. 1972; 238(82):124-6. DOI: 10.1038/newbio238124a0. View

10.

Blakemore C, Carpenter R, Georgeson M . Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system. Nature. 1970; 228(5266):37-9. DOI: 10.1038/228037a0. View

11.

Kawabata N . Analysis of the angle perception based on the angle matching technique. Vision Res. 1981; 21(5):701-3. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90078-x. View

12.

Levinson J, Frome F . Perception of size of one object among many. Science. 1979; 206(4425):1425-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.505017. View

13.

Hubel D, Wiesel T . Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962; 160:106-54. PMC: 1359523. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. View

14.

Bouma H, Andriessen J . Induced changes in the perceived orientation of line segments. Vision Res. 1970; 10(4):333-49. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(70)90104-5. View

15.

Lennie P . Distortions of perceived orientation. Nat New Biol. 1971; 233(39):155-6. DOI: 10.1038/newbio233155a0. View

16.

Ganz L . Mechanism of the figural aftereffects. Psychol Rev. 1966; 73(2):128-50. DOI: 10.1037/h0022952. View

17.

Wenderoth P, White D . Angle-matching illusions and perceived line orientation. Perception. 1979; 8(5):565-75. DOI: 10.1068/p080565. View

18.

Hubel D, Wiesel T . Ferrier lecture. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977; 198(1130):1-59. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1977.0085. View

19.

Wenderoth P, Johnson M . Constant errors do not occur in the matched reproduction of angles. Percept Psychophys. 1982; 32(4):388-92. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206244. View

20.

MacRae A, Loh H . Constant errors occur in matched reproduction of angles even when likely biases are eliminated. Percept Psychophys. 1981; 30(4):341-6. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206148. View