Structure-activity Studies on Amphetamine Analogs Using Drug Discrimination Methodology
Overview
Pharmacology
Psychology
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
Animals (rats) trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of S(+)-amphetamine sulfate from saline, using a standard operant training procedure, were administered doses of various amphetamine analogs in tests of stimulus generalization in order to study structure-activity relationships (SAR). The types of structural variation of the amphetamine molecule that were investigated included (a) benz-fusion of the aromatic nucleus, (b) alpha-demethylation of the alkyl side chain, (c) conversion of the benzylic methylene to a carbonyl group, and (d) conformational restriction of the side chain. Benz-fusion and alpha-demethylation appear to have a detrimental effect on activity in that none of these analogs produced amphetamine-appropriate responding. However, the carbonylated analog, i.e., cathinone, was found to be equipotent with amphetamine. Furthermore, as with amphetamine, the S-isomer of cathinone was found to be more active than its enantiomer. With respect to the conformationally-restricted analogs, the most potent compound was 2-aminotetralin which was about half as active as racemic amphetamine.
Halberstadt A, Brandt S, Walther D, Baumann M Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019; 236(3):989-999.
PMID: 30904940 PMC: 6848746. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05207-1.
Nelson K, Lopez-Arnau R, Hempel B, To P, Manke H, Crissman M Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018; 236(3):1067-1077.
PMID: 30334086 PMC: 8328279. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-018-5070-x.
Structure-Activity Relationships of Synthetic Cathinones.
Glennon R, Dukat M Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2016; 32:19-47.
PMID: 27830576 PMC: 5818155. DOI: 10.1007/7854_2016_41.
Smith D, Blough B, Banks M Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016; 234(1):117-127.
PMID: 27709249 PMC: 5203958. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4444-1.
Negus S, Banks M Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2016; 32:119-131.
PMID: 27696217 PMC: 5425248. DOI: 10.1007/7854_2016_18.