» Articles » PMID: 6507683

The California Automated Mortality Linkage System (CAMLIS)

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 1984 Dec 1
PMID 6507683
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The California Automated Mortality Linkage System (CAMLIS), established in 1981 to facilitate the conduct of follow-up studies in the State of California, employs a combination of deterministic and probabilistic linkage decision criteria to perform the death clearance function. The system was evaluated against four traditional death clearance procedures and the performance of each procedure measured in terms of measures of sensitivity and specificity. Only one procedure was associated with a specificity lower than 0.99; for that one, the specificity was 0.93. There was much greater fluctuation in the observed sensitivity levels. In one of the procedures, CAMLIS demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.97 versus 0.79 for the Social Security Administration. A comparison against the National Death Index (NDI) produced sensitivities of 0.89 for CAMLIS and 0.94 for the NDI. An assessment of manual search procedures using a file of Japanese names produced a CAMLIS sensitivity measure of 0.92 compared with 0.93 for the manual search. Another manual search procedure using microfiche copies of the state death index produced a CAMLIS sensitivity of 0.97; in this evaluation, the sensitivity of the manual search was defined as 1.0. Another measure of performance of a death clearance procedure is its predictive value in identifying a person who has died; CAMLIS generated predictive values in these evaluations that ranged from 0.93 through 0.99, contrasted with the NDI value of 0.59.

Citing Articles

CKD stage-specific utility of two equations for predicting 1-year risk of ESKD.

Zheng S, Parikh R, Tan T, Pravoverov L, Patel J, Horiuchi K PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0293293.

PMID: 37910454 PMC: 10619781. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293293.


Evaluation of California Non-Comprehensive Death File Against National Death Index.

Chen X, Park R, Hurtado C, Gransar H, Tep B, Miranda-Peats R Dialogues Health. 2023; 1.

PMID: 37007866 PMC: 10065452. DOI: 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100015.


Thromboembolism after treatment with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate or plasma for warfarin-related bleeding.

Go A, Leong T, Sung S, Wei R, Harrison T, Gupta N J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022; 54(3):470-479.

PMID: 35984591 PMC: 9553785. DOI: 10.1007/s11239-022-02695-5.


Dialysis therapy and mortality in older adults with heart failure and advanced chronic kidney disease: A high-dimensional propensity-matched cohort study.

Zheng S, Yang J, Tan T, Belani S, Law D, Pravoverov L PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0262706.

PMID: 35061809 PMC: 8782375. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262706.


Torsade de pointes: A nested case-control study in an integrated healthcare delivery system.

Mantri N, Lu M, Zaroff J, Risch N, Hoffmann T, Oni-Orisan A Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021; 27(1):e12888.

PMID: 34547155 PMC: 8739596. DOI: 10.1111/anec.12888.


References
1.
Newcombe H . Record linking: the design of efficient systems for linking records into individual and family histories. Am J Hum Genet. 1967; 19(3 Pt 1):335-59. PMC: 1706275. View

2.
Smith M, Newcombe H . Accuracies of computer versus manual linkages of routine health records. Methods Inf Med. 1979; 18(2):89-97. View

3.
BEEBE G . Record linkage systems--Canada vs the United States. Am J Public Health. 1980; 70(12):1246-8. PMC: 1619657. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.70.12.1246. View

4.
Howe G, Lindsay J . A generalized iterative record linkage computer system for use in medical follow-up studies. Comput Biomed Res. 1981; 14(4):327-40. DOI: 10.1016/0010-4809(81)90004-5. View

5.
MI M, Kagawa J, Earle M . An operational approach to record linkage. Methods Inf Med. 1983; 22(2):77-82. View