» Articles » PMID: 6456895

Cefoperazone in the Treatment of Severe or Complicated Infections

Overview
Journal Drugs
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1981 Jan 1
PMID 6456895
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We report the use of cefoperazone in 62 cases of serious infection, most of which occurred in patients with renal impairment. 43 severe or complicated urinary tract infections, 11 cases of pneumonia and 8 with other severe sepsis were treated with cefoperazone 1 to 2 g twice daily usually for 5 to 10 days. Of the patients with urinary tract infection, all who were symptomatic showed a rapid clinical response; 26 (61%) were cured including 11 of 16 with chronic renal failure; 12 relapsed and 5 were reinfected with a different pathogen. All of these patients were infected by organisms sensitive to cefoperazone by disc testing but in 5 of those who relapsed the cefoperazone MIC was in fact greater than or equal to 50 microgram/ml. Ten of 11 cases with radiologically confirmed pneumonia were cured with cefoperazone. 7 episodes of pneumonia were in patients with end-stage chronic renal failure (6 were on dialysis) and 1 was in a patient with acute renal failure. Seven of 8 cases with severe sepsis were cured with cefoperazone. 1 patient was withdrawn from the study when acute bronchospasm followed a 2 g intravenous dose. 2 of the successfully treated patients had functioning renal transplants, 2 of 3 with severe chronic renal failure were on dialysis and 1 had acute renal failure. Side effects included minor disturbances of liver function in 6 patients (11%), diarrhoea in 7 (13%) and marked alcohol intolerance in one, 4 patients with chronic renal failure developed a coagulation disorder which was corrected with vitamin K. None of the patients showed deterioration in renal function while receiving cefoperazone. Cefoperazone promises to be an effective drug for the treatment of a wide spectrum of severe infections in hospitalised patients including those with impaired renal function.

Citing Articles

Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Induced Abdominal Wall Hematoma and Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Cai Z, Yang W, He Y, Chen Q, Wang S, Luo X Drug Saf Case Rep. 2016; 3(1):2.

PMID: 27747682 PMC: 5005745. DOI: 10.1007/s40800-016-0025-9.


Cefoperazone: A review of its in vitro antimicrobial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Brogden R, Carmine A, Heel R, Morley P, Speight T, Avery G Drugs. 1981; 22(6):423-60.

PMID: 6459224 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198122060-00002.


Clinical pharmacokinetics of the third generation cephalosporins.

Balant L, Dayer P, Auckenthaler R Clin Pharmacokinet. 1985; 10(2):101-43.

PMID: 3888488 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198510020-00001.


Clinical consequences of development of resistance to third generation cephalosporins.

Follath F, Costa E, Thommen A, Frei R, Burdeska A, Meyer J Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987; 6(4):446-50.

PMID: 3117534 DOI: 10.1007/BF02013108.


Discrepancies between disk diffusion and broth susceptibility studies of the activity of ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid against ticarcillin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Manian F, ALFORD R Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986; 30(1):35-8.

PMID: 3092732 PMC: 176430. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.30.1.35.

References
1.
Reeves D, Davies A . Antabuse effect with cephalosporins. Lancet. 1980; 2(8193):540. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91868-1. View

2.
MASHIMO K, Kunii O . Clinical trials with cefoperazone in the field of internal medicine in Japan. Clin Ther. 1980; 3(Spec Issue):159-72. View

3.
Shibata K . Clinical trials with cefoperazone in the field of surgery in Japan. Clin Ther. 1980; 3(Spec Issue):173-89. View

4.
Neu H, Prince A . Interaction between moxalactam and alcohol. Lancet. 1980; 1(8183):1422. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92693-8. View

5.
Reddy J, Bailey R . Vitamin K deficiency developing in patients with renal failure treated with cephalosporin antibiotics. N Z Med J. 1980; 92(672):378-9. View