» Articles » PMID: 6363220

Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer with Pirenzepine and Cimetidine

Overview
Journal Gut
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1984 Feb 1
PMID 6363220
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this single blind controlled multicentre trial was to compare the relative effectiveness of pirenzepine and cimetidine in healing endoscopically proven duodenal ulcers. One hundred and twenty six patients with duodenal ulcer were treated with a daily dose of 100 mg pirenzepine (50 mg each before breakfast and before the evening meal), and 128 patients were treated with 1000 mg cimetidine (200 mg with breakfast, lunch, and evening meal and 400 mg at bedtime). Endoscopy was repeated after four weeks by an endoscopist who had not been informed about the treatment. Pirenzepine showed a healing rate of 64.3%, cimetidine one of 73.4%. This difference is not statistically significant (one-sided test: chi 1(2) = 2.48). After four weeks a higher proportion of first ulcers than of recurrent lesions was healed. Pain relief was rapidly achieved with both drugs. A significant trend in favour of cimetidine may, however, not be clinically relevant considering the small difference in the absolute numbers of pain free days and nights. Adverse effects were rare and reversible. We conclude that the efficacy of pirenzepine is similar to that of cimetidine in healing duodenal ulcers.

Citing Articles

PPIs and gastric cancer: any causal relationship?.

Crafa P, Franceschi M, Rodriguez-Castro K, Franzoni L, Russo M, Brandimarte G Acta Biomed. 2023; 94(3):e2023096.

PMID: 37326271 PMC: 10308480. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v94i3.14105.


Prospective multicentre study of risk factors associated with delayed healing of recurrent duodenal ulcers (RUDER). RUDER Study Group.

Armstrong D, Arnold R, Classen M, Fischer M, Goebell H, Blum A Gut. 1993; 34(10):1319-26.

PMID: 8244095 PMC: 1374534. DOI: 10.1136/gut.34.10.1319.


Pirenzepine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases.

Carmine A, Brogden R Drugs. 1985; 30(2):85-126.

PMID: 3928324 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198530020-00001.


Evaluation of pirenzepine on gastric acidity in healthy volunteers using ambulatory 24 hour intragastric pH-monitoring.

Etienne A, Fimmel C, Bron B, Loizeau E, Blum A Gut. 1985; 26(3):241-5.

PMID: 3882525 PMC: 1432615. DOI: 10.1136/gut.26.3.241.


Anti-ulcer therapy. Past to present.

BETTARELLO A Dig Dis Sci. 1985; 30(11 Suppl):36S-42S.

PMID: 2865091 DOI: 10.1007/BF01309383.

References
1.
Ivey K . Anticholinergics: do they work in peptic ulcer?. Gastroenterology. 1975; 68(1):154-66. View

2.
WALKENSTEIN S, Dubb J, Randolph W, WESTLAKE W, Stote R, INTOCCIA A . Bioavailability of cimetidine in man. Gastroenterology. 1978; 74(2 Pt 2):360-5. View

3.
WINSHIP D . Cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: review and commentary. Gastroenterology. 1978; 74(2 Pt 2):402-6. View

4.
Giger M, Gonvers J, WEBER K, Sonnenberg A, Birchler R, Mattle W . [Therapy of duodenal ulcer with cimetidine, pirenzipine and placebo: report on a double-blind randomized study]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1979; 109(16):617-8. View

5.
Bianchi Porro G, Petrillo M . Pirenzepine in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. Review and commentary. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1982; 72:229-36. View