» Articles » PMID: 633114

Characterization and Ionic Basis of GABA-induced Depolarizations Recorded in Vitro from Cat Primary Afferent Neurones

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1978 Feb 1
PMID 633114
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. Responses of single cells in the isolated cat spinal ganglion to GABA applied by superfusion or by iontophoresis were recorded using intracellular micro-electrodes. 2. Of the twelve structurally related compounds investigated, GABA was the most effective in its ability to produce a depolarization of the cell membrane. 3. Studies determining concentration-response relationships indicate that two to three molecules of GABA are required to combine with the GABA receptor for activation. 4. Bicuculline and picrotoxin, each act in a non-competitive manner to antagonize the GABA-induced membrane current. 5. The equilibrium potential for iontophoretically induced GABA depolarizations (EGABA) was found to be -23.5 plus or minys 6.1 mV. EGABA was independent upon [cl-]o, but independent of [Na+]o, [K+], or [Ca2+]o. 6. Intracellular injection of twenty antions (Br-, I-, NO2-, NO3-, ClO4-, SCN-, Bf4-, HS-, OCN-, ClO3-, BrO3-, F-, HCO2-, HSO3-, HCO3-, CH3CO2-, SO42-, C6H5O73-) indicated that the activated GABA receptor membrane was permeable to those anions whose hydrated diameter is no larger than that of ClO-3. 7. Restoration of the GABA depolarization to its control level after augmentation by Cl- injection had a mean time constant of 27.8 plus or minus 2.6 min. Picrotoxin did not alter this value. 8. When foreign anions were exchanged for Cl- in the perfusion solution, the ten anaions smaller or equal to ClO3-, decreased the GABA depolarization by 50-90% and increased its time course 1.5-2.0 x control. The only exception having a small radius was Br- which augmented the amplitude 10-30%. 9. The ten anions larger than ClO3- produced a biphasic effect, i.e. an initial augmentation followed by a marked (up to 100%) depression of the response. Experiments with CH3COO-, CH3SO4-, or HOCH2CH2SO3-, indicated that this depression was non-competitive.

Citing Articles

Facilitation of sensory transmission to motoneurons during cortical or sensory-evoked primary afferent depolarization (PAD) in humans.

Metz K, Matos I, Li Y, Afsharipour B, Thompson C, Negro F J Physiol. 2023; 601(10):1897-1924.

PMID: 36916205 PMC: 11037101. DOI: 10.1113/JP284275.


Presynaptic Inhibition of Pain and Touch in the Spinal Cord: From Receptors to Circuits.

Comitato A, Bardoni R Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(1).

PMID: 33401784 PMC: 7795800. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010414.


Spontaneous and evoked neurotransmission are partially segregated at inhibitory synapses.

Horvath P, Piazza M, Monteggia L, Kavalali E Elife. 2020; 9.

PMID: 32401197 PMC: 7250572. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.52852.


Local Ca signals couple activation of TRPV1 and ANO1 sensory ion channels.

Shah S, Carver C, Mullen P, Milne S, Lukacs V, Shapiro M Sci Signal. 2020; 13(629).

PMID: 32345727 PMC: 7285899. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aaw7963.


Extrasynaptic αGABA receptors on proprioceptive afferents produce a tonic depolarization that modulates sodium channel function in the rat spinal cord.

Lucas-Osma A, Li Y, Lin S, Black S, Singla R, Fouad K J Neurophysiol. 2018; 120(6):2953-2974.

PMID: 30256739 PMC: 6337028. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00499.2018.


References
1.
Dudel J . PRESYNAPTIC AND POSTSYNAPTIC EFFECTS OF INHIBITORY DRUGS ON THE CRAYFISH NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1965; 283:104-18. DOI: 10.1007/BF00363182. View

2.
Araki T, Ito M, OSCARSSON O . Anion permeability of the synaptic and non-synaptic motoneurone membrane. J Physiol. 1961; 159:410-35. PMC: 1359542. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006818. View

3.
Schmidt R . PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES ON THE PRIMARY AFFERENT DEPOLARIZATION OF THE TOAD SPINAL CORD. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1963; 277:325-46. DOI: 10.1007/BF00362515. View

4.
Crain S . Resting and action potentials of cultured chick embryo spinal ganglion cells. J Comp Neurol. 1956; 104(2):285-329. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901040207. View

5.
COOMBS J, ECCLES J, FATT P . The electrical properties of the motoneurone membrane. J Physiol. 1955; 130(2):291-325. PMC: 1363414. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005411. View