» Articles » PMID: 6291619

Induction of Choline Kinase by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Rat Liver. I. A Comparison of Choline Kinases from Normal and 3-methylcholanthrene-induced Rat Liver Cytosol

Overview
Specialties Biochemistry
Biophysics
Date 1982 Oct 14
PMID 6291619
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Choline kinase in rat liver has been shown to be induced up to 2-fold by the administration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogens such as 3-methylcholanthrene and 3,4-benzo[a]pyrene (Ishidate, K., Tsuruoka, M. and Nakazawa, Y., (1980) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 96, 946-952). In order to characterize the nature of choline kinase induction by these carcinogens, the 3-methylcholanthrene-induced form as well as the normal form of choline kinase were partially purified from rat liver cytosol through acid treatment, (NH4)2SO4 precipitation and DEAE-cellulose column chromatography with linear KCl-gradient elution, and the catalytic properties were compared between the two preparations. Both enzyme activities were purified about 17-fold with a yield of 50% through the purification steps and there appeared no detectable difference in the elution pattern from either DEAE-cellulose column or Sephadex G-200 gel filtration. On the other hand, some differences were observed in catalytic properties between the two enzyme preparations; (1) the induced form showed a higher apparent Km value for choline (0.19 mM) when compared to the normal form (0.11 mM) and (2) the addition of polyamines caused a considerable increase in the maximum reaction velocity for the normal form whereas no remarkable change for the induced form, when the activities were plotted as a function of choline concentration. The overall results suggest that the 3-methylcholanthrene-induced form of choline kinase in rat liver could be different from the normal form, or that there exist several isoenzymes of choline kinase in rat liver, and one or some of them are inducible by the administration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Citing Articles

Species-Specific Differences in Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Responses: How and Why?.

Xu X, Zhang X, Yuan Y, Zhao Y, Fares H, Yang M Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(24).

PMID: 34948089 PMC: 8708342. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413293.


Comparative metabolomic and genomic analyses of TCDD-elicited metabolic disruption in mouse and rat liver.

Forgacs A, Kent M, Makley M, Mets B, DelRaso N, Jahns G Toxicol Sci. 2011; 125(1):41-55.

PMID: 21964420 PMC: 3243745. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr262.


Hepatic microsomal phospholipids in rats exposed intratracheally to coal fly ash.

Srivastava P, Chauhan S, Misra U Arch Toxicol. 1986; 58(3):199-202.

PMID: 3754434 DOI: 10.1007/BF00340982.