» Articles » PMID: 6259336

Physiological Regulation of Synaptic Effectiveness at Frog Neuromuscular Junctions

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1980 Oct 1
PMID 6259336
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. Nerve terminals in two different muscles of the frog, the sartorius and cutaneous pectoris (c.p.), have been found to differ sharply in safety factor. This difference is shown to be attributable to corresponding disparities in the amount of transmitter released, without evident correlated morphological differences. 2. In Ringer containing 0.3 mM-Ca2+ and 1 mM-Mg2+, quantal content of c.p. junctions exceeded that of sartorius junctions by 3-4 times. 3. When quantal content was corrected for nerve terminal size, c.p. terminals still released 2-4 times more transmitter per unit terminal length. 4. Light and electron microscopic examination of junctional morphology in the two muscles revealed no significant difference in the spacing of presynaptic active zones, the width of synaptic contact, or the density of presynaptic vesicles and mitochondria. It seems likely, therefore, that the greater release at c.p. junctions is due to a 'physiological' difference between the two populations of terminals. 5. No evidence could be found that action potential invasion of the terminal was less complete in the sartorius than in the c.p. 6. The dependence of evoked and spontaneous release on Ca2+ concentration was of similar slope for terminals in the two muscles, but of different absolute value, consistent with the observed difference in release.

Citing Articles

Postsynaptic receptors regulate presynaptic transmitter stability through transsynaptic bridges.

Godavarthi S, Hiramoto M, Ignatyev Y, Levin J, Li H, Pratelli M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(15):e2318041121.

PMID: 38568976 PMC: 11009644. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2318041121.


Cellular and Subcellular Characteristics of Neuromuscular Junctions in Muscles with Disparate Duty Cycles and Myofiber Profiles.

Deschenes M, Mifsud M, Patek L, Flannery R Cells. 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36766702 PMC: 9913535. DOI: 10.3390/cells12030361.


The Frog Motor Nerve Terminal Has Very Brief Action Potentials and Three Electrical Regions Predicted to Differentially Control Transmitter Release.

Ginebaugh S, Cyphers E, Lanka V, Ortiz G, Miller E, Laghaei R J Neurosci. 2020; 40(18):3504-3516.

PMID: 32265260 PMC: 7189764. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2415-19.2020.


Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis in Different Model Systems.

Gan Q, Watanabe S Front Cell Neurosci. 2018; 12:171.

PMID: 30002619 PMC: 6031744. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00171.


Impact of spatiotemporal calcium dynamics within presynaptic active zones on synaptic delay at the frog neuromuscular junction.

Homan A, Laghaei R, Dittrich M, Meriney S J Neurophysiol. 2017; 119(2):688-699.

PMID: 29167324 PMC: 5867380. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00510.2017.


References
1.
Rahamimoff R . A dual effect of calcium ions on neuromuscular facilitation. J Physiol. 1968; 195(2):471-80. PMC: 1351673. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008468. View

2.
Kuno M, TURKANIS S, Weakly J . Correlation between nerve terminal size and transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1971; 213(3):545-56. PMC: 1331740. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009399. View

3.
TURKANIS S . Effects of muscle stretch on transmitter release at end-plates of rat diaphragm and frog sartorius muscle. J Physiol. 1973; 230(2):391-403. PMC: 1350369. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010194. View

4.
Peper K, Dreyer F, Sandri C, Akert K, Moor H . Structure and ultrastructure of the frog motor endplate. A freeze-etching study. Cell Tissue Res. 1974; 149(4):437-55. DOI: 10.1007/BF00223024. View

5.
Dennis M, Miledi R . Characteristics of transmitter release at regenerating frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1974; 239(3):571-94. PMC: 1330959. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010583. View