» Articles » PMID: 6177643

Microbiology Diagnosis of Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection

Overview
Journal Infection
Date 1982 Jan 1
PMID 6177643
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The etiological diagnosis of what is today known as infection by Chlamydia trachomatis was first made possible in 1907 when Halberstaedter and von Prowazek identified inclusions in conjunctival scrapings by means of Giemsa staining. C. trachomatis was originally classified as a virus, and the culture systems used were those for viruses. Macchiavello was the first to describe the isolation of C. trachomatis in embryonated hens' eggs (1944), but the first isolation is usually credited to T'ang and co-workers (1957), also using eggs. A major step in the understanding of chlamydial infections was made in 1965 when Gordon and Quan published a paper on the use of irradiated McCoy cells for isolation purposes. This technique made it possible to perform cultures from genital specimens with simplicity in comparison to isolation from eggs. Various culture techniques have been developed parallel to the expanding knowledge of the basic biology of the genus Chlamydia. McCoy cells (mouse fibroblasts), HeLa 229 (derived from human cervical carcinoma cells) and BHK-21 cells (baby hamster kidney cells) are the cell types regularly used for the culture of C. trachomatis. The principles underlying the various culture techniques are discussed. A description of the original irradiated McCoy cell system and the simplified, sensitive technique using cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells are given in this paper.

Citing Articles

Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Warren R, Dwyer B, Plackett M, Pettit K, Rizvi N, Baker A J Clin Microbiol. 1993; 31(6):1663-6.

PMID: 8315015 PMC: 265603. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1663-1666.1993.


Recent advances in Chlamydia trachomatis.

Ladany S, Sarov I Eur J Epidemiol. 1985; 1(4):235-56.

PMID: 3915982 DOI: 10.1007/BF00237099.


Comparison of two enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Grillner L, Beckman S, Hammar H Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1986; 5(5):559-62.

PMID: 3536502 DOI: 10.1007/BF02017705.


Immunodiagnosis of ocular chlamydial infection.

Rahi A, Rashood A, Rahi S, Tabbara K, Al-Jama A Int Ophthalmol. 1988; 12(1):65-72.

PMID: 3065268 DOI: 10.1007/BF00133784.


Use of HL cells for improved isolation and passage of Chlamydia pneumoniae.

Cles L, Stamm W J Clin Microbiol. 1990; 28(5):938-40.

PMID: 2191013 PMC: 267841. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.5.938-940.1990.


References
1.
Bushell A, Hobson D . Effect of cortisol on the growth of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells. Infect Immun. 1978; 21(3):946-53. PMC: 422088. DOI: 10.1128/iai.21.3.946-953.1978. View

2.
Darougar S, Cubitt S, Jones B . Effect of high-speed centrifugation on the sensitivity of irradiated McCoy cell culture for the isolation of Chlamydia. Br J Vener Dis. 1974; 50(4):308-12. PMC: 1045047. DOI: 10.1136/sti.50.4.308. View

3.
GORDON F, Harper I, QUAN A, TREHARNE J, Dwyer R, GARLAND J . Detection of Chlamydia (Bedsonia) in certain infections of man. I. Laboratory procedures: comparison of yolk sac and cell culture for detection and isolation. J Infect Dis. 1969; 120(4):451-62. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/120.4.451. View

4.
HOWARD L . Neutralization of Chlamydia trachomatis in cell culture. Infect Immun. 1975; 11(4):698-703. PMC: 415123. DOI: 10.1128/iai.11.4.698-703.1975. View

5.
Becker Y, Hochberg E, Zakay-Rones Z . Interaction of trachoma elementary bodies with host cells. Isr J Med Sci. 1969; 5(1):121-4. View