» Articles » PMID: 6118170

Single and Repeated Dose Comparison of Three Antihistamines and Phenylpropanolamine: Psychomotor Performance and Subjective Appraisals of Sleep

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1981 Aug 1
PMID 6118170
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1 In a double-blind cross-over study, nine healthy male students received placebo, brompheniramine 12 mg), carbinoxamine (12 mg), clemastine (1 mg), and phenylpropanolamine (50 mg) orally. Three doses of each drug were given: at 08.30 h and 21.00 h on the first day of treatment and at 08.30 h on the following day. 2 Psychomotor skills and subjective feelings were recorded before and 2, 6 and 12 h after the first dose on day 1 as well as before and 2 and 6 h after the third dose on day 2. Subjective appraisals of sleep were requested on the morning of day 2. 3 All antihistamines tended to cause subjective drowsiness on the first day of treatment. Drowsiness was felt for a maximum of 2 h after carbinoxamine, 6 h after brompheniramine, and 12 h after clemastine. In contrast to antihistamines, phenylpropanolamine made subjects more alert and quick witted. Tolerance to the antihistamine-induced drowsiness developed on the second day. 4 Divided attention, tracking, speed anticipation and sleep were not affected by any drug. Carbinoxamine slowed reactions 2 h after the first dose, but no impairment was measured in objective tests after brompheniramine or clemastine. 5 Phenylpropanolamine improved reaction speed and reaction accuracy and enhanced flicker recognition throughout the study. Phenylpropanolamine plasma levels and improvement in flicker fusion test results correlated with each other on day 2. 6 The results suggest that phenylpropanolamine and the antihistamines studied are comparatively harmless to psychomotor performance and driving skills.

Citing Articles

Carbinoxaminium dipicrate.

Ramya V, Jasinski J, Shannon J, Yathirajan H, Ravishankara D Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online. 2013; 69(Pt 8):o1264-5.

PMID: 24109348 PMC: 3793761. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813018886.


Repeated-dose effects of mequitazine, cetirizine and dexchlorpheniramine on driving and psychomotor performance.

Theunissen E, Vermeeren A, Ramaekers J Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006; 61(1):79-86.

PMID: 16390354 PMC: 1884990. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02524.x.


H1-receptor antagonists. Comparative tolerability and safety.

Simons F Drug Saf. 1994; 10(5):350-80.

PMID: 7913608 DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199410050-00002.


Effects of mizolastine and clemastine on actual driving and psychomotor performance in healthy volunteers.

Vuurman E, Uiterwijk M, Rosenzweig P, OHanlon J Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1994; 47(3):253-9.

PMID: 7867678 DOI: 10.1007/BF02570505.


Effects of antihistamine medications on exercise performance. Implications for sportspeople.

Montgomery L, Deuster P Sports Med. 1993; 15(3):179-95.

PMID: 7680815 DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199315030-00004.


References
1.
Ghanekar A, Gupta V . Quantitative determinations of two decongestants and an antihistamine in combination using paired ion high-pressure liquid chromatography. J Pharm Sci. 1978; 67(6):873-4. DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600670643. View

2.
Hindmarch I, Parrott A . A repeated dose comparison of the side effects of five antihistamines on objective assessments of psychomotor performance, central nervous system arousal and subjective appraisals of sleep and early morning behaviour. Arzneimittelforschung. 1978; 28(3):483-6. View

3.
Clarke C, Nicholson A . Performance studies with antihistamines. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978; 6(1):31-5. PMC: 1429387. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1978.tb01678.x. View

4.
Reinberg A, Levi F, Guillet P, Burke J, Nicolai A . Chronopharmacological study of antihistamines in man with special references to terfenadine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1978; 14(4):245-52. DOI: 10.1007/BF00560457. View

5.
Moser L, Huther K, Koch-Weser J, LUNDT P . Effects of terfenadine and diphenhydramine alone or in combination with diazepam or alcohol on psychomotor performance and subjective feelings. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1978; 14(6):417-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF00716383. View