» Articles » PMID: 574948

Effects of Glucose and Ouabain on Transepithelial Electrical Resistance and Cell Volume in Stripped and Unstripped Goldfish Intestine

Overview
Journal Pflugers Arch
Specialty Physiology
Date 1979 Dec 1
PMID 574948
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. In goldfish intestine (perfused unstripped segments and mucosal strips) the serosal addition of ouabain (10(-4) M) resulted in a vanishment of the transepithelial potential difference and in a continuous increase in transepithelial resistance. 2. Incubation of mucosal strips with ouabain resulted in an increase in sodium content which was greater than the decrease in potassium content. The resulting increase in cation content was accompanied by an increase in chloride content and an increase in water content. 3. Histological examination showed that exposure to ouabain resulted in a swelling of the epithelial layer as compared to the control situation. 4. The ouabain induced resistance increase is greater in the presence of glucose, 3-OMG or fructose than in the presence of mannitol. Phlorizin (10(-4) M) inhibits the extra resistance increase induced by mucosal glucose but is without effect on the fructose induced extra resistance increase. The initial velocity and the magnitude of the glucose induced extra resistance increase depends on the glucose concentration. 5. The results suggest that in goldfish intestine ouabain induces cellular swelling with a concomitant collapse of the lateral intercellular spaces, which is the cause of the increased transepithelial resistance. The additional changes in resistance induced by sugars suggest that the cell membrane is more permeable to glucose, 3-OMG and fructose than to mannitol. The resulting changes in osmotically active material within the epithelial cell influence the cross-sectional area and consequently the conductivity of the paracellular shunt pathway. The hypothesis that these sugars do not induce a resistance change in the absence of ouabain is discussed.

Citing Articles

Reperfused Myocardial Infarction: The Road to CCS Classification of Acute MI and Beyond.

Dharmakumar R, Kloner R, Fishbein M, Heusch G, Vora K, Gropler R JACC Adv. 2025; 4(2):101528.

PMID: 40021272 PMC: 11905164. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101528.


Transepithelial Electrical Impedance Increase Following Porous Substrate Electroporation Enables Label-Free Delivery.

Brooks J, Heiman T, Lorenzen S, Mungloo I, Mirfendereski S, Park J Small. 2024; 20(25):e2310221.

PMID: 38396158 PMC: 11186731. DOI: 10.1002/smll.202310221.


Analysis of the ouabain-induced increase in transepithelial electrical resistance in the goldfish intestinal mucosa.

Groot J, Albus H, Bakker R Pflugers Arch. 1981; 392(1):67-71.

PMID: 7322834 DOI: 10.1007/BF00584584.


Cell volume regulation in goldfish intestinal mucosa.

Groot J Pflugers Arch. 1981; 392(1):57-66.

PMID: 7322833 DOI: 10.1007/BF00584583.


Microscopical determination of the filtration permeability of the mucosal surface of the goldfish intestinal epithelium.

Siegenbeek van Heukelom J, van den Ham M, Albus H, Groot J J Membr Biol. 1981; 63(1-2):31-9.

PMID: 7310849 DOI: 10.1007/BF01969443.


References
1.
Wilczewski T, BRODSKY W . Effects of ouabain and amiloride on Na pathways in turtle bladders. Am J Physiol. 1975; 228(3):781-90. DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1975.228.3.781. View

2.
Okada Y, Irimajiri A, INOUYE A . Electrical properties and active solute transport in rat small intestine. II. Conductive properties of transepithelial routes. J Membr Biol. 1977; 31(3):221-32. DOI: 10.1007/BF01869406. View

3.
Hopfer U . A distinct D-fructose transport system in isolated brush border membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974; 367(2):247-54. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(74)90047-9. View

4.
HAJJAR J, KHURI R, Curran P . Alanine efflux across the serosal border of turtle intestine. J Gen Physiol. 1972; 60(6):720-34. PMC: 2226098. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.60.6.720. View

5.
Macknight A, Civan M, Leaf A . Some effects of ouabain on cellular ions and water in epithelial cells of toad urinary bladder. J Membr Biol. 1975; 20(3-4):387-401. DOI: 10.1007/BF01870645. View