» Articles » PMID: 573312

Cutaneous Masking. I. Psychophysical Observations on Interactions of Multipoint Stimuli in Man

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 1979 Jul 1
PMID 573312
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. Psychophysical masking of cutaneous sensation at the locus of punctate test stimulation has been quantitatively examined with phasic mechanical and brief air-pulse stimuli using a conditioning-test stimulus paradigm. 2. Masking was maximal at the minimal interstimulus distance effective with this paradigm, varies inversely with interstimulus distance, and is demonstrable with the conditioning and test stimuli up to 10 cm apart on the forearm. 3. The degree of masking was found to be a direct function of the relative intensity of the conditioning stimulus with respect to the test stimulus. 4. Variations in the interstimulus interval permitted an investigation of the temporal features of cutaneous masking. It was detectable from 10 ms before to 70 ms after conditioning stimulation. Maximum masking occurred when the test stimulus was delivered about 10 ms following conditioning stimulus onset. 5. We also noted the much less marked, but still significant, enhancement phenomenon, in which weak conditioning stimuli, at just-threshold intensity levels, lowered the detection threshold for sensation at the test stimulus locus. We found this enhancement of sensation to have the same spatial distribution as did masking, but a much reduced time course. It began with the test stimulus presented simultaneously with the conditioning stimulus, peaked with 10--15 ms interstimulus intervals, but decayed in less than 40 ms. 6. Since psychophysical experiments often form the framework for the understanding of physiologic processes, it is suggested that these behavioral determinations of enhancement and masking may be correlated with the electrophysiologic properties of excitation and inhibition in neurons of the major primary somatic pathways of the central nervous system.

Citing Articles

Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding.

Malesevic J, Kostic M, Jure F, Spaich E, Dosen S, Ilic V Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(19).

PMID: 36236758 PMC: 9572222. DOI: 10.3390/s22197658.


Predictive attenuation of touch and tactile gating are distinct perceptual phenomena.

Kilteni K, Ehrsson H iScience. 2022; 25(4):104077.

PMID: 35372807 PMC: 8968059. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104077.


The influence of afferent input on somatosensory suppression during grasping.

Broda M, Fiehler K, Voudouris D Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):18692.

PMID: 33122705 PMC: 7596517. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75610-8.


Early integration of bilateral touch in the primary somatosensory cortex.

Tame L, Pavani F, Papadelis C, Farne A, Braun C Hum Brain Mapp. 2014; 36(4):1506-23.

PMID: 25514844 PMC: 6869154. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22719.


Tactile frequency discrimination is enhanced by circumventing neocortical adaptation.

Musall S, von der Behrens W, Mayrhofer J, Weber B, Helmchen F, Haiss F Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17(11):1567-73.

PMID: 25242306 DOI: 10.1038/nn.3821.