» Articles » PMID: 567226

Analogous Ultrastructure and Surface Properties During Capping and Phagocytosis in Leukocytes

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1978 Jun 1
PMID 567226
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ultrastructural analyses have revealed striking similarities between Concanavalin A capping and phagocytosis in leukocytes. Both processes involve extensive membrane movement to form a protuberance or pseudopods; a dense network of microfilaments is recruited into both the protuberance and the pseudopods; microtubules are disassembled either generally (capping) or in the local region of the pseudopods (phagocytosis); and cells generally depleted of microtubules by colchicine show polarized phagocytosis via the microfilament-rich protuberance rather than uniform peripheral ingestion of particles via individual pseudopods. Cap formation can thus be viewed as occurring as an exaggeration of the same ultrastructural events that mediate phagocytosis. Similar changes in cell surface topography also accompany capping and phagocytosis. Thus, in nonfixed cells, Concanavalin A-receptor complexes aggregate into the region of the protuberance in colchicine-treated leukocytes (conventional capping) or into the region of pseudopod formation in phagocytizing leukocytes. In the latter case, the movement of lectin-receptor complexes occurs from membrane overlying peripheral microtubules into filament-rich pseudopods that exclude microtubules. These data provide evidence against a role for microtubules as "anchors" for lectin receptors. Rather, they indicate a preferential movement of cell surface Concanavalin A-receptor complexes towards areas of extensive (the protuberance) or localized (pseudopods) microfilament concentration. In conventional capping, Concanavalin A must be added to the colchicine-treated cells before fixation in order to demonstrate movement of receptors from a diffuse distribution into the protuberance. However, Convanavalin A receptors are enriched in the membrane associated with phagocytic particles as compared to the remaining membrane. This particle-induced redistribution of receptors is particularly prominent in colchicine-treated cells that phagocytize and are then fixed and Concanavalin A labeled; both lectin receptors and beads are concentrated over the protuberance. Thus, the final analogy between conventionally capped and phagocytic cells is that in both cases the properties of the plasma membrane in regions of microfilament concentration are modified by Concanavalin A itself (capping) or by the phagocytized particle, to limit locally the diffusion of Concanavalin A receptors.

Citing Articles

-induced neutrophil extracellular traps in neonatal calves is a stage-independent process.

Grabbe M, Conejeros I, Velasquez Z, Hasheminasab S, Kamena F, Wehrend A Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1256726.

PMID: 37662980 PMC: 10470472. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1256726.


Polarization of endocytosis and receptor topography on cultured macrophages.

Walter R, BERLIN R, Pfeiffer J, Oliver J J Cell Biol. 1980; 86(1):199-211.

PMID: 7419574 PMC: 2110654. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.86.1.199.


Motility and adhesiveness in human neutrophils. Redistribution of chemotactic factor-induced adhesion sites.

Smith C, Hollers J J Clin Invest. 1980; 65(4):804-12.

PMID: 7358846 PMC: 434466. DOI: 10.1172/JCI109731.


Phagocytosis-induced 51Cr release from activated macrophages and blood mononuclears. Effect of colchicine and antioxidants.

McGee M, Hale A Inflammation. 1981; 5(3):241-52.

PMID: 7298163 DOI: 10.1007/BF00914447.


Abnormal mobility of neonatal polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Relationship to impaired redistribution of surface adhesion sites by chemotactic factor or colchicine.

Anderson D, Hughes B, Smith C J Clin Invest. 1981; 68(4):863-74.

PMID: 7287906 PMC: 370873. DOI: 10.1172/jci110341.


References
1.
BERLIN R, Fera J . Changes in membrane microviscosity associated with phagocytosis: effects of colchicine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977; 74(3):1072-6. PMC: 430595. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.74.3.1072. View

2.
Oliver J, Lalchandani R, Becker E . Actin redistribution during Concanavalin A cap formation in rabbit neutrophils. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1977; 21(5):359-64. View

3.
Schreiner G, Fujiwara K, Pollard T, UNANUE E . Redistribution of myosin accompanying capping of surface Ig. J Exp Med. 1977; 145(5):1393-8. PMC: 2180660. DOI: 10.1084/jem.145.5.1393. View

4.
Albertini D, BERLIN R, Oliver J . The mechanism of concanavalin A cap formation in leukocytes. J Cell Sci. 1977; 26:57-75. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.26.1.57. View

5.
Hoffstein S, Goldstein I, Weissmann G . Role of microtubule assembly in lysosomal enzyme secretion from human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. A reevaluation. J Cell Biol. 1977; 73(1):242-56. PMC: 2109893. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.73.1.242. View