Tanner A, Spitzer E, Hyzy J, Grose J
Ear Hear. 2018; 40(4):1009-1015.
PMID: 30557224
PMC: 6570590.
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000683.
Grose J, Porter H, Buss E
Trends Hear. 2016; 20.
PMID: 27742880
PMC: 5068923.
DOI: 10.1177/2331216516670388.
Oberfeld D, Klockner-Nowotny F
Elife. 2016; 5.
PMID: 27580272
PMC: 5441891.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.16747.
Leibold L, Bonino A, Buss E
Ear Hear. 2016; 37(3):345-53.
PMID: 26783855
PMC: 4844837.
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000270.
Gaudrain E, Carlyon R
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 133(1):502-18.
PMID: 23297922
PMC: 3785145.
DOI: 10.1121/1.4770243.
Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.
Ozmeral E, Buss E, Hall J
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 132(2):1152-64.
PMID: 22894234
PMC: 3427370.
DOI: 10.1121/1.4730976.
Perception of interrupted speech: effects of dual-rate gating on the intelligibility of words and sentences.
Shafiro V, Sheft S, Risley R
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 130(4):2076-87.
PMID: 21973362
PMC: 3206910.
DOI: 10.1121/1.3631629.
Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.
Wang X, Humes L
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 128(4):2100-11.
PMID: 20968381
PMC: 2981122.
DOI: 10.1121/1.3483733.
Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.
Buss E, Hall 3rd J
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 126(5):2467-78.
PMID: 19894827
PMC: 2787071.
DOI: 10.1121/1.3212944.
Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task.
Buss E, Whittle L, Grose J, Hall 3rd J
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 126(1):269-80.
PMID: 19603883
PMC: 2723900.
DOI: 10.1121/1.3129506.
Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.
Bashford Jr J, Warren R, Brown C
Percept Psychophys. 1996; 58(3):342-50.
PMID: 8935895
DOI: 10.3758/bf03206810.
Intelligibility of interrupted meaningful and nonsense speech with and without intervening noise.
Verschuure J, Brocaar M
Percept Psychophys. 1983; 33(3):232-40.
PMID: 6866682
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202859.
Effects of spectral alternation on the intelligibility of words and sentences.
Bashford Jr J, Warren R
Percept Psychophys. 1987; 42(5):431-8.
PMID: 3696938
DOI: 10.3758/bf03209750.
Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction.
Bashford Jr J, Warren R
Percept Psychophys. 1987; 42(2):114-21.
PMID: 3627931
DOI: 10.3758/bf03210499.
Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.
Bashford Jr J, Riener K, Warren R
Percept Psychophys. 1992; 51(3):211-7.
PMID: 1561046
DOI: 10.3758/bf03212247.
