Article: Family practice in the United States of America: the first 10 years

Family medicine was officially recognized as an independent discipline and as the twentieth specialty in the USA in 1969, when the American Board of Family Practice was established.The main achievements of the first 10 years has been the establishment of departments of family practice in two thirds of the medical schools and the growth of graduate training has advanced rapidly from a total of 290 residents in 1970 to over 6,000 in 1978. Developments in group practice, team work, and medical records have been considerable and research is expanding.In 1976, the 50-year trend of falling numbers of family physicians in the USA was reversed for the first time and excellent progress is also being made in countering the geographical maldistribution of physicians.The challenges for the future of family practice are different from those in the past and are discussed.

Citing Articles

Family Medicine Research in the United States From the late 1960s Into the Future.

Bowman M, Lucan S, Rosenthal T, Mainous 3rd A, James P Fam Med. 2017; 49(4):289-295.

PMID: 28414408 PMC: 5407380.

Just a GP.

Gray D J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980; 30(213):231-9.

PMID: 7411515 PMC: 2159452.

References

1.

Geyman J . Family practice in evolution: progress, problems and projections. N Engl J Med. 1978; 298(11):593-601. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197803162981104. View

2.

Pellegrino E . The academic viability of family medicine. A triad of challenges. JAMA. 1978; 240(2):132-5. View

3.

WILLARD W, RUHE C . The challenge of family practice reconsidered. JAMA. 1978; 240(5):454-8. View

4.

Longnecker D, Wright J, Gillen J . Profile of full-time family practice educators. J Fam Pract. 1977; 4(1):111-2. View

5.

Beck J, STEWART W, Graham R, Stern T . The effect of the organization and status of family practice undergraduate programs on residency selection. J Fam Pract. 1977; 4(4):663-9. View

6.

FROOM J . An intregrated medical record and data system for primary care. Part 2: classifications of health problems for use by family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1977; 4(6):1149-51. View

7.

FROOM J, Culpepper L, Boisseau V . An integrated medical record and data system for primary care. Part 3: the diagnostic index manual and computer methods and applications. J Fam Pract. 1977; 5(1):113-20. View

8.

Baker R, MCWHINNEY I, Brown T . Undergraduate education in family medicine. J Fam Pract. 1977; 5(1):37-46. View

9.

Leaman T, Geyman J, Brown T . Graduate education in family practice. J Fam Pract. 1977; 5(1):47-61. View

10.

Geyman J . Research in the family practice residency program. J Fam Pract. 1977; 5(2):245-8. View

11.

Collins F, Roessler R . Intellectual and attitudinal characteristics of medical students selecting family practice. J Fam Pract. 1975; 2(6):431-2. View

12.

Marsland D, Wood M, MAYO F . A data bank for patient care, curriculum, and research in family practice: 526,196 patient problems. J Fam Pract. 1976; 3(1):25-8. View

13.

McWhinney I . General practice as an academic discipline. Reflections after a visit to the United States. Lancet. 1966; 1(7434):419-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)91412-7. View

14.

Eimerl T . Organized Curiosity: A Practical Approach to the Problem of Keeping Records for Research Purposes in General Practice. J Coll Gen Pract. 2009; 3(2):246-52. PMC: 1903136. View

Family Practice in the United States of America: the First 10 Years