» Articles » PMID: 5352044

Accumulation of Caesium and Rubidium in Vivo by Red and White Muscles of the Rat

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1969 Sep 1
PMID 5352044
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. Rats were given drinking water containing either 20 mM-CsCl or 20 mM-RbCl for a period of 2 weeks. Samples of blood were then taken from the rats under anaesthetic. They were immediately centrifuged and the plasma taken for analysis. Soleus muscles, diaphragm, extensor digitorum longus, white gastrocnemius and vastus lateralis muscles were then taken from the dead animals and these and the plasma were analysed for potassium, and for caesium or rubidium by means of the flame photometer.2. The concentrations of potassium and rubidium or caesium in the fibre water of these various muscles and in the samples of plasma water were then calculated.3. It was found that the red muscles including soleus and diaphragm generally tended to accumulate caesium and rubidium to a greater extent than did the white muscles such as the white gastrocnemius and vastus lateralis.4. When the concentration ratio [K](i)/[K](o) was divided into the ratio [Rb](i)/[Rb](o) for the different muscles, values of about 1.3 were obtained for the red muscles compared with values about 1.14 for white muscles.5. When in the case of the caesium-treated rats the ratio [K](i)/[K](o) was divided into the ratio [Cs](i)/[Cs](o) values ranged from 1.94 +/- 0.12 for the red soleus to 1.08 +/- 0.09 for the white gastrocnemius.6. When these values in the caesium-treated animals were plotted against the percentage of red fibres in the five muscle types (as obtained from the data of Sreter & Woo, 1963) the graph indicated that the white fibres had similar ionic gradients for Cs(+) and K(+) and that affinity for Cs(+) was confined to the red fibres.7. The membrane potential measured in soleus and extensor muscles immersed in plasma from the same animal was not significantly different from E(K) but was much less than E(Cs).8. These results are interpreted in terms of permeability differences between the slow red fibres and white twitch fibres.

Citing Articles

Total and effective coronary blood flow in coronary and noncoronary heart disease.

Mymin D, Sharma G J Clin Invest. 1974; 53(2):363-73.

PMID: 11344548 PMC: 301477. DOI: 10.1172/JCI107568.


Effects of cesium on cellular systems.

Ghosh A, Sharma A, Talukder G Biol Trace Elem Res. 1993; 38(2):165-203.

PMID: 7508252 DOI: 10.1007/BF02784052.


Effects of nerve cross-union on rat intracellular potassium in fast-twitch and slow-twitch rat muscles.

Hoh J, Salafsky B J Physiol. 1971; 216(1):171-9.

PMID: 5558348 PMC: 1331967. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009516.


Studies of caesium uptake by rat soleus and vastus lateralis muscles in vivo and of its efflux rate relative to potassium in vitro.

Kernan R Pflugers Arch. 1972; 333(2):95-110.

PMID: 5065512 DOI: 10.1007/BF00586910.


Rubidium influx into rat skeletal muscles in relation to electrical activity.

Kernan R, McDermott M J Physiol. 1973; 233(2):363-74.

PMID: 4747232 PMC: 1350571. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010312.


References
1.
Dockry M, Kernan R, Tangney A . Active transport of sodium and potassium in mammalian skeletal muscle and its modification by nerve and by cholinergic and adrenergic agents. J Physiol. 1966; 186(1):187-200. PMC: 1395898. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008028. View

2.
Kernan R . Membrane potential changes during sodium transport in frog sartorius muscle. Nature. 1962; 193:986-7. DOI: 10.1038/193986a0. View

3.
Mueller P . POTASSIUM AND RUBIDIUM EXCHANGE ACROSS THE SURFACE MEMBRANE OF CARDIAC PURKINJE FIBRES. J Physiol. 1965; 177:453-62. PMC: 1357259. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007604. View

4.
Bolingbroke V, Harris E, Sjodin R . Rubidium and caesium entry, and cation interaction in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1961; 157(2):289-305. PMC: 1359952. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006722. View

5.
Lubin M, SCHNEIDER P . The exchange of potassium for caesium and rubidium in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1957; 138(1):140-55. PMC: 1363034. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005842. View